mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SMS: Self-supervised Model Seeding for Verification of Machine Unlearning

arXiv 2509.25613 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Many machine unlearning methods have been proposed recently to uphold users' right to be forgotten. However, offering users verification of their data removal post-unlearning is an important yet under-explored problem. Current verifications typically rely on backdooring, i.e., adding backdoored samples to influence model performance. Nevertheless, the backdoor methods can merely establish a connection between backdoored samples and models but fail to connect the backdoor with genuine samples. Thus, the backdoor removal can only confirm the unlearning of backdoored samples, not users' genuine samples, as genuine samples are independent of backdoored ones. In this paper, we propose a Self-supervised Model Seeding (SMS) scheme to provide unlearning verification for genuine samples. Unlike backdooring, SMS links user-specific seeds (such as users' unique indices), original samples, and models, thereby facilitating the verification of unlearning genuine samples. However, implementing SMS for unlearning verification presents two significant challenges. First, embedding the seeds into the service model while keeping them secret from the server requires a sophisticated approach. We address this by employing a self-supervised model seeding task, which learns the entire sample, including the seeds, into the model's latent space. Second, maintaining the utility of the original service model while ensuring the seeding effect requires a delicate balance. We design a joint-training structure that optimizes both the self-supervised model seeding task and the primary service task simultaneously on the model, thereby maintaining model utility while achieving effective model seeding. The effectiveness of the proposed SMS scheme is evaluated through extensive experiments, which demonstrate that SMS provides effective verification for genuine sample unlearning, addressing existing limitations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 34 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

Builds on

34 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025CRFU: Compressive Representation Forgetting Against Privacy Leakage on Machine Unlearning27 Feb
  2. 2024Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile1 Aug
  3. 2024What makes unlearning hard and what to do about it3 Jun
  4. 2024Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearning4 Apr
  5. 2023ERASER: Machine Unlearning in MLaaS via an Inference Serving-Aware Approach3 Nov
  6. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
  7. 2022Knowledge Removal in Sampling-based Bayesian Inference24 Mar
  8. 2022Markov Chain Monte Carlo-Based Machine Unlearning: Unlearning What Needs to be Forgotten28 Feb
  9. 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning22 Oct
  10. 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug
  11. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar

Other references · 23

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  2. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  3. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  4. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  5. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 831
  6. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 809
  7. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  8. 2013Black Box Variational Inferencecited by 317
  9. 2020Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attackcited by 304
  10. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
  11. 2019Texture Fields: Learning Texture Representations in Function Spacecited by 210
  12. 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
11 more
  1. 2020DeltaGrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning modelscited by 143
  2. 2020Variational Bayesian Unlearningcited by 114
  3. 2017Adversarial Variational Bayes: Unifying Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 107
  4. 2022Narcissus: A Practical Clean-Label Backdoor Attack with Limited Informationcited by 102
  5. 2019[Extended version] Rethinking Deep Neural Network Ownership Verification: Embedding Passports to Defeat Ambiguity Attackscited by 82
  6. 2020Towards Probabilistic Verification of Machine Unlearningcited by 46
  7. 2021Protecting Intellectual Property of Generative Adversarial Networks from Ambiguity Attackcited by 45
  8. 2023Backdoor Defense via Adaptively Splitting Poisoned Datasetcited by 43
  9. 2022Task Adaptive Parameter Sharing for Multi-Task Learningcited by 42
  10. 2022VeriFi: Towards Verifiable Federated Unlearningcited by 41
  11. 2022Membership Inference via Backdooringcited by 24

Built on by

Not cited yet.