mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Probabilistic Verification of Machine Unlearning

arXiv 2003.04247 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2020cs.CR cs.LG stat.MLcited by 46

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 27 in LLM safety and security, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

The right to be forgotten, also known as the right to erasure, is the right of individuals to have their data erased from an entity storing it. The status of this long held notion was legally solidified recently by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union. Consequently, there is a need for mechanisms whereby users can verify if service providers comply with their deletion requests. In this work, we take the first step in proposing a formal framework to study the design of such verification mechanisms for data deletion requests -- also known as machine unlearning -- in the context of systems that provide machine learning as a service (MLaaS). Our framework allows the rigorous quantification of any verification mechanism based on standard hypothesis testing. Furthermore, we propose a novel backdoor-based verification mechanism and demonstrate its effectiveness in certifying data deletion with high confidence, thus providing a basis for quantitatively inferring machine unlearning. We evaluate our approach over a range of network architectures such as multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), convolutional neural networks (CNN), residual networks (ResNet), and long short-term memory (LSTM), as well as over 5 different datasets. We demonstrate that our approach has minimal effect on the ML service's accuracy but provides high confidence verification of unlearning. Our proposed mechanism works even if only a handful of users employ our system to ascertain compliance with data deletion requests. In particular, with just 5% of users participating, modifying half their data with a backdoor, and with merely 30 test queries, our verification mechanism has both false positive and false negative ratios below 10-3. We also show the effectiveness of our approach by testing it against an adaptive adversary that uses a state-of-the-art backdoor defense method.

Key facts. Cited by 46 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 14; 2022: 9; 2023: 8; 2024: 10; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

46 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearningcited by 360
  2. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearningcited by 298
  3. 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearningcited by 209
  4. 2021Graph Unlearningcited by 129
  5. 2021Turn the Combination Lock: Learnable Textual Backdoor Attacks via Word Substitutioncited by 85
  6. 2021Hard to Forget: Poisoning Attacks on Certified Machine Unlearningcited by 47
  7. 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
  8. 2023Exploring the Landscape of Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomycited by 44
  9. 2022VeriFi: Towards Verifiable Federated Unlearningcited by 41
  10. 2022Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attackscited by 37
  11. 2024Machine Unlearning Fails to Remove Data Poisoning Attackscited by 35
  12. 2024Threats, Attacks, and Defenses in Machine Unlearning: A Surveycited by 34
34 more
  1. 2022Verifiable and Provably Secure Machine Unlearningcited by 24
  2. 2023zkDL: Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Deep Learning Trainingcited by 20
  3. 2021DeepObliviate: A Powerful Charm for Erasing Data Residual Memory in Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
  4. 2023Attacks in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Systematic Survey from the Life-cycle Perspectivecited by 19
  5. 2021A Framework for Deprecating Datasets: Standardizing Documentation, Identification, and Communicationcited by 18
  6. 2023Machine Unlearning: A Surveycited by 18
  7. 2024Is Retain Set All You Need in Machine Unlearning? Restoring Performance of Unlearned Models with Out-Of-Distribution Imagescited by 18
  8. 2022A Survey of Neural Trojan Attacks and Defenses in Deep Learningcited by 17
  9. 2022SIFU: Sequential Informed Federated Unlearning for Efficient and Provable Client Unlearning in Federated Optimizationcited by 16
  10. 2024A General Framework for Data-Use Auditing of ML Modelscited by 15
  11. 2024SoK: Dataset Copyright Auditing in Machine Learning Systemscited by 14
  12. 2024Machine Unlearning Doesn't Do What You Think: Lessons for Generative AI Policy and Researchcited by 14
  13. 2022An Introduction to Machine Unlearningcited by 13
  14. 2023DUCK: Distance-based Unlearning via Centroid Kinematicscited by 13
  15. 2023Information Flow Control in Machine Learning through Modular Model Architecturecited by 11
  16. 2021SoK: Machine Learning Governancecited by 9
  17. 2021Bayesian Inference Forgettingcited by 7
  18. 202110 Security and Privacy Problems in Large Foundation Modelscited by 5
  19. 2021Lightweight machine unlearning in neural networkcited by 4
  20. 2023Defending Our Privacy With Backdoorscited by 4
  21. 2024How to Forget Clients in Federated Online Learning to Rank?cited by 4
  22. 2024A Reliable Cryptographic Framework for Empirical Machine Unlearning Evaluationcited by 4
  23. 2024Graph Neural Backdoor: Fundamentals, Methodologies, Applications, and Future Directionscited by 4
  24. 2025Instance-Level Data-Use Auditing of Visual ML Modelscited by 4
  25. 2021RBNN: Memory-Efficient Reconfigurable Deep Binary Neural Network with IP Protection for Internet of Thingscited by 3
  26. 2022Trojan Horse Training for Breaking Defenses against Backdoor Attacks in Deep Learningcited by 3
  27. 2021TRAPDOOR: Repurposing backdoors to detect dataset bias in machine learning-based genomic analysiscited by 2
  28. 2022Landing AI on Networks: An equipment vendor viewpoint on Autonomous Driving Networkscited by 2
  29. 2023Towards Regulatable AI Systems: Technical Gaps and Policy Opportunitiescited by 2
  30. 2025RUB: Evaluating Residual Knowledge in Unlearned Modelscited by 1
  31. 2025Efficient Machine Unlearning by Model Splitting and Core Sample Selectioncited by 1
  32. 2026Governing AI Forgetting: Auditing for Machine Unlearning Compliancecited by 1
  33. 2024Composite Concept Extraction through Backdooringcited by 0
  34. 2025SMS: Self-supervised Model Seeding for Verification of Machine Unlearningcited by 0