mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ERASER: Machine Unlearning in MLaaS via an Inference Serving-Aware Approach

arXiv 2311.16136 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2023cs.CR cs.AIcited by 15

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the past years, Machine Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS) has received a surging demand for supporting Machine Learning-driven services to offer revolutionized user experience across diverse application areas. MLaaS provides inference service with low inference latency based on an ML model trained using a dataset collected from numerous individual data owners. Recently, for the sake of data owners' privacy and to comply with the "right to be forgotten (RTBF)" as enacted by data protection legislation, many machine unlearning methods have been proposed to remove data owners' data from trained models upon their unlearning requests. However, despite their promising efficiency, almost all existing machine unlearning methods handle unlearning requests independently from inference requests, which unfortunately introduces a new security issue of inference service obsolescence and a privacy vulnerability of undesirable exposure for machine unlearning in MLaaS. In this paper, we propose the ERASER framework for machinE unleaRning in MLaAS via an inferencE seRving-aware approach. ERASER strategically choose appropriate unlearning execution timing to address the inference service obsolescence issue. A novel inference consistency certification mechanism is proposed to avoid the violation of RTBF principle caused by postponed unlearning executions, thereby mitigating the undesirable exposure vulnerability. ERASER offers three groups of design choices to allow for tailor-made variants that best suit the specific environments and preferences of various MLaaS systems. Extensive empirical evaluations across various settings confirm ERASER's effectiveness, e.g., it can effectively save up to 99% of inference latency and 31% of computation overhead over the inference-oblivion baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 39 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2023.

Builds on

39 of 78 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023A Duty to Forget, a Right to be Assured? Exposing Vulnerabilities in Machine Unlearning Services15 Sep
  2. 2022Deep Unlearning via Randomized Conditionally Independent Hessians15 Apr
  3. 2021Hard to Forget: Poisoning Attacks on Certified Machine Unlearning17 Sep
  4. 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug
  5. 2021Certifiable Machine Unlearning for Linear Models29 Jun
  6. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar
  7. 2021Machine Unlearning via Algorithmic Stability25 Feb

Other references · 32

  1. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  2. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  3. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  4. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  5. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  6. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  7. 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
  8. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
  9. 2020Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Modelscited by 250
  10. 2016Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving Systemcited by 191
  11. 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
  12. 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
20 more
  1. 2020Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 158
  2. 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 156
  3. 2020DeltaGrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning modelscited by 143
  4. 2021On the Importance of Difficulty Calibration in Membership Inference Attackscited by 137
  5. 2021Graph Unlearningcited by 129
  6. 2020Machine Unlearning for Random Forestscited by 125
  7. 2020Serving DNNs like Clockwork: Performance Predictability from the Bottom Upcited by 119
  8. 2020Variational Bayesian Unlearningcited by 114
  9. 2020Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attackscited by 112
  10. 2022Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectorycited by 93
  11. 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 90
  12. 2021ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 79
  13. 2022Recommendation Unlearningcited by 71
  14. 2020DeepRecSys: A System for Optimizing End-To-End At-scale Neural Recommendation Inferencecited by 54
  15. 2022Improved Certified Defenses against Data Poisoning with (Deterministic) Finite Aggregationcited by 50
  16. 2022Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attackscited by 37
  17. 2022Amplifying Membership Exposure via Data Poisoningcited by 29
  18. 2021SSSE: Efficiently Erasing Samples from Trained Machine Learning Modelscited by 28
  19. 2023Generated Distributions Are All You Need for Membership Inference Attacks Against Generative Modelscited by 22
  20. 2022On the Privacy Risks of Cell-Based NAS Architecturescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 10; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: