JE-IRT: A Geometric Lens on LLM Abilities through Joint Embedding Item Response Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard LLM evaluation practices compress diverse abilities into single scores, obscuring their inherently multidimensional nature. We present JE-IRT, a geometric item-response framework that embeds both LLMs and questions in a shared space. For question embeddings, the direction encodes semantics and the norm encodes difficulty, while correctness on each question is determined by the geometric interaction between the model and question embeddings. This geometry replaces a global ranking of LLMs with topical specialization and enables smooth variation across related questions. Building on this framework, our experimental results reveal that out-of-distribution behavior can be explained through directional alignment, and that larger norms consistently indicate harder questions. Moreover, JE-IRT naturally supports generalization: once the space is learned, new LLMs are added by fitting a single embedding. The learned space further reveals an LLM-internal taxonomy that only partially aligns with human-defined subject categories. We also show that simple linear probes of the embedding space recover cross-subject ability directions, such as an arithmetic axis that highlights quantitatively demanding questions in seemingly distant subjects like virology and global facts. JE-IRT thus establishes a unified and interpretable geometric lens that connects LLM abilities with the structure of questions, offering a distinctive perspective on model evaluation and generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.
Builds on
30 of 45 references.
References · 30
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
18 more
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
- 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
- 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 543
- 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 318
- 2023A Cookbook of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 250
- 2025Llama-Nemotron: Efficient Reasoning Modelscited by 158
- 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 144
- 2021DEMix Layers: Disentangling Domains for Modular Language Modelingcited by 132
- 2025Lost in Benchmarks? Rethinking Large Language Model Benchmarking with Item Response Theorycited by 45
- 2019Learning Latent Parameters without Human Response Patterns: Item Response Theory with Artificial Crowdscited by 40
- 2025IRT-Router: Effective and Interpretable Multi-LLM Routing via Item Response Theorycited by 40
- 2025Fluid Language Model Benchmarkingcited by 35
- 2019Enhancing Item Response Theory for Cognitive Diagnosiscited by 25
- 2025Temporal Sampling for Forgotten Reasoning in LLMscited by 12
- 2023ALBA: Adaptive Language-based Assessments for Mental Healthcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026LOCUS: Low-Dimensional Model Embeddings for Efficient Model Exploration, Comparison, and Selectioncited by 2
- 2026Beyond Scores: Diagnostic LLM Evaluation via Fine-Grained Abilitiescited by 1
- 2026Stochastic Sampling is Epistemically Shallow: The Dimensionality Gap Between Temperature Variation and Model Diversity in LLMscited by 1
- 2026LLM Evaluation on Unseen Questions: Contextual Multidimensional IRT Modelcited by 1
- 2026LLM Evaluation on Unseen Questions: Contextual Multidimensional IRT Model23 Aug 2026
- 2026Stochastic Sampling is Epistemically Shallow: The Dimensionality Gap Between Temperature Variation and Model Diversity in LLMs18 May 2026
- 2026Beyond Scores: Diagnostic LLM Evaluation via Fine-Grained Abilities14 Apr 2026
- 2026LOCUS: Low-Dimensional Model Embeddings for Efficient Model Exploration, Comparison, and Selection28 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Learning Compact Representations of LLM Abilities via Item Response Theory
- 2026From Memorization to Creation: Evaluating the Cognitive Depth of LLM-Generated Educational Questions
- 2025None of the Others: a General Technique to Distinguish Reasoning from Memorization in Multiple-Choice LLM Evaluation Benchmarks
- 2026Geometric Deviation as an Unsupervised Pre-Generation Reliability Signal: Probing LLM Representations for Answerability
- 2026Formalizing Latent Thoughts: Four Axioms of Thought Representation in LLMs
- 2025Geometry of Decision Making in Language Models
- 2025Representation Consistency for Accurate and Coherent LLM Answer Aggregation
- 2025No Answer Needed: Predicting LLM Answer Accuracy from Question-Only Linear Probes