mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Latent Parameters without Human Response Patterns: Item Response Theory with Artificial Crowds

arXiv 1908.11421 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2019cs.CLcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Incorporating Item Response Theory (IRT) into NLP tasks can provide valuable information about model performance and behavior. Traditionally, IRT models are learned using human response pattern (RP) data, presenting a significant bottleneck for large data sets like those required for training deep neural networks (DNNs). In this work we propose learning IRT models using RPs generated from artificial crowds of DNN models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of learning IRT models using DNN-generated data through quantitative and qualitative analyses for two NLP tasks. Parameters learned from human and machine RPs for natural language inference and sentiment analysis exhibit medium to large positive correlations. We demonstrate a use-case for latent difficulty item parameters, namely training set filtering, and show that using difficulty to sample training data outperforms baseline methods. Finally, we highlight cases where human expectation about item difficulty does not match difficulty as estimated from the machine RPs.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 8; 2025: 8; 2026: 15.

40 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theorycited by 55
  2. 2021Better than Average: Paired Evaluation of NLP Systemscited by 30
  3. 2025Fluid Language Model Benchmarkingcited by 30
  4. 2025Reliable and Efficient Amortized Model-based Evaluationcited by 29
  5. 2021What Ingredients Make for an Effective Crowdsourcing Protocol for Difficult NLU Data Collection Tasks?cited by 23
  6. 2025How to Select Datapoints for Efficient Human Evaluation of NLG Models?cited by 23
  7. 2021Rissanen Data Analysis: Examining Dataset Characteristics via Description Lengthcited by 22
  8. 2025SMART: Simulated Students Aligned with Item Response Theory for Question Difficulty Predictioncited by 21
  9. 2022py-irt: A Scalable Item Response Theory Library for Pythoncited by 19
  10. 2024Psychometric Alignment: Capturing Human Knowledge Distributions via Language Modelscited by 18
  11. 2024Raising the Bar: Investigating the Values of Large Language Models via Generative Evolving Testingcited by 17
  12. 2025Do LLMs Give Psychometrically Plausible Responses in Educational Assessments?cited by 14
28 more
  1. 2021Can Transformer Language Models Predict Psychometric Properties?cited by 8
  2. 2024Is your benchmark truly adversarial? AdvScore: Evaluating Human-Grounded Adversarialnesscited by 7
  3. 2024A Psychology-based Unified Dynamic Framework for Curriculum Learningcited by 6
  4. 2026BRIDGE: Predicting Human Task Completion Time From Model Performancecited by 6
  5. 2024Automatic Generation and Evaluation of Reading Comprehension Test Items with Large Language Modelscited by 5
  6. 2022A Spectral Approach to Item Response Theorycited by 4
  7. 2025JE-IRT: A Geometric Lens on LLM Abilities through Joint Embedding Item Response Theorycited by 4
  8. 2025Can LLMs Estimate Cognitive Complexity of Reading Comprehension Items?cited by 4
  9. 2026Confident Rankings with Fewer Items: Adaptive LLM Evaluation with Continuous Scorescited by 4
  10. 2024Aligning Teacher with Student Preferences for Tailored Training Data Generationcited by 3
  11. 2025QG-SMS: Enhancing Test Item Analysis via Student Modeling and Simulationcited by 3
  12. 2026Can We Trust Item Response Theory for AI Evaluation?cited by 3
  13. 2023Computational modeling of semantic changecited by 2
  14. 2024How the Advent of Ubiquitous Large Language Models both Stymie and Turbocharge Dynamic Adversarial Question Generationcited by 1
  15. 2024PATCH! {P}sychometrics-{A}ssis{T}ed Ben{CH}marking of Large Language Models against Human Populations: A Case Study of Proficiency in 8th Grade Mathematicscited by 1
  16. 2026AUDITA: A New Dataset to Audit Humans vs. AI Skill at Audio QAcited by 1
  17. 2026Auditing the Audit: Five Failure Modes in Benchmark-Validity Auditscited by 1
  18. 2026Item Response Theory for AI Safetycited by 1
  19. 2026LLM Evaluation on Unseen Questions: Contextual Multidimensional IRT Modelcited by 1
  20. 2026ThinkPrior: Zero-Rollout Difficulty Priors for Cold-Start Prompt Selection in RLVRcited by 1
  21. 2023Multi-Dimensional Ability Diagnosis for Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 0
  22. 2026ReLE: A Scalable System and Structured Benchmark for Diagnosing Capability Anisotropy in Chinese LLMscited by 0
  23. 2026MCQ Difficulty Prediction via Modeling Learner Heterogeneity Using Data-Driven Cognitive Profilingcited by 0
  24. 2026The Annotation Scarcity Paradox in Low-Resource NLP Evaluation: A Decade of Acceleration and Emerging Constraintscited by 0
  25. 2026Efficient Safety Benchmarking via Item Response Theorycited by 0
  26. 2026DualEval: Joint Model-Item Calibration for Unified LLM Evaluationcited by 0
  27. 2026What Does MMLU Actually Measure? A Psychometric Audit of Difficulty Structure in Aggregate Benchmark Scorescited by 0
  28. 2026Rubric Rewards from Item Response Theorycited by 0