Stochastic Sampling is Epistemically Shallow: The Dimensionality Gap Between Temperature Variation and Model Diversity in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When a language model gives different answers on repeated runs, does that variation reveal what it does not know? Self-consistency turns the variation into a per-question uncertainty estimate via majority voting. But does the same variation reveal cross-question structure -- related questions flipping together, the way a diverse ensemble does? We compare two regimes on the same questions: one model run 100 times at τ=1 versus an ensemble of 24 LLMs run once each at τ=0. A Marchenko--Pastur random-matrix test separates signal from sampling noise on both sides. Within any single model, at most one dimension rises above noise across five families and three benchmarks (MMLU, HellaSwag, GSM8K). Across the ensemble, four eigenvalues clear the noise edge, while a matched-difficulty Bernoulli null produces at most one in 500 Monte Carlo draws. Self-consistency gives accurate per-question uncertainty but no detectable cross-question structure; only a diverse ensemble surfaces what a model does not know.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 22 references.
References · 15
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2025Correlated Errors in Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2024metabench -- A Sparse Benchmark of Reasoning and Knowledge in Large Language Modelscited by 35
- 2025General Scales Unlock AI Evaluation with Explanatory and Predictive Powercited by 30
3 more
- 2025Monte Carlo Temperature: a robust sampling strategy for LLM's uncertainty quantification methodscited by 12
- 2026Complementing Self-Consistency with Cross-Model Disagreement for Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 9
- 2025JE-IRT: A Geometric Lens on LLM Abilities through Joint Embedding Item Response Theorycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Revisiting Self-Consistency from Dynamic Distributional Alignment Perspective on Answer Aggregation
- 2026Rethinking Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language Models
- 2026The Illusion of Stochasticity in LLMs
- 2025Efficient semantic uncertainty quantification in language models via diversity-steered sampling
- 2025On the Effect of Sampling Diversity in Scaling LLM Inference
- 2025LLMs are Overconfident: Evaluating Confidence Interval Calibration with FermiEval
- 2025Simple Yet Effective: An Information-Theoretic Approach to Multi-LLM Uncertainty Quantification
- 2025Self-Consistency Is Losing Its Edge: Diminishing Returns and Rising Costs in Modern LLMs