mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Compact Representations of LLM Abilities via Item Response Theory

arXiv 2510.00844 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent years have witnessed a surge in the number of large language models (LLMs), yet efficiently managing and utilizing these vast resources remains a significant challenge. In this work, we explore how to learn compact representations of LLM abilities that can facilitate downstream tasks, such as model routing and performance prediction on new benchmarks. We frame this problem as estimating the probability that a given model will correctly answer a specific query. Inspired by the item response theory (IRT) in psychometrics, we model this probability as a function of three key factors: (i) the model's multi-skill ability vector, (2) the query's discrimination vector that separates models of differing skills, and (3) the query's difficulty scalar. To learn these parameters jointly, we introduce a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) network that couples model- and query-level embeddings. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach leads to state-of-the-art performance in both model routing and benchmark accuracy prediction. Moreover, analysis validates that the learned parameters encode meaningful, interpretable information about model capabilities and query characteristics.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 31 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

31 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May

Other references · 30

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  5. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  8. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
  9. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 633
  10. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
  11. 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 525
  12. 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 314
18 more
  1. 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 295
  2. 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
  3. 2023Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasetscited by 166
  4. 2024GraphRouter: A Graph-based Router for LLM Selectionscited by 154
  5. 2023Routing to the Expert: Efficient Reward-guided Ensemble of Large Language Modelscited by 141
  6. 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 84
  7. 2024RouterDC: Query-Based Router by Dual Contrastive Learning for Assembling Large Language Modelscited by 84
  8. 2025Universal Model Routing for Efficient LLM Inferencecited by 80
  9. 2025MixLLM: Dynamic Routing in Mixed Large Language Modelscited by 56
  10. 2024EmbedLLM: Learning Compact Representations of Large Language Modelscited by 46
  11. 2024Harnessing the Power of Multiple Minds: Lessons Learned from LLM Routingcited by 43
  12. 2025The Avengers: A Simple Recipe for Uniting Smaller Language Models to Challenge Proprietary Giantscited by 37
  13. 2025Beyond GPT-5: Making LLMs Cheaper and Better via Performance-Efficiency Optimized Routingcited by 32
  14. 2025Prompt-to-Leaderboardcited by 27
  15. 2025How Benchmark Prediction from Fewer Data Misses the Markcited by 26
  16. 2025Capability Instruction Tuning: A New Paradigm for Dynamic LLM Routingcited by 25
  17. 2025Route to Reason: Adaptive Routing for LLM and Reasoning Strategy Selectioncited by 23
  18. 2025Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time Computecited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Lost in Benchmarks? Rethinking Large Language Model Benchmarking with Item Response Theory
  2. 2025Evaluating Expert Contributions in a MoE LLM for Quiz-Based Tasks
  3. 2025Demystifying the Roles of LLM Layers in Retrieval, Knowledge, and Reasoning
  4. 2025The Self-Execution Benchmark: Measuring LLMs' Attempts to Overcome Their Lack of Self-Execution
  5. 2024MMLU-Pro+: Evaluating Higher-Order Reasoning and Shortcut Learning in LLMs
  6. 2025Latency-Response Theory Model: Evaluating Large Language Models via Response Accuracy and Chain-of-Thought Length
  7. 2025DeepQuestion: Systematic Generation of Real-World Challenges for Evaluating LLMs Performance
  8. 2026Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling Estimation