mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CiteFix: Enhancing RAG Accuracy Through Post-Processing Citation Correction

arXiv 2504.15629 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.IR cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful application of Large Language Models (LLMs), revolutionizing information search and consumption. RAG systems combine traditional search capabilities with LLMs to generate comprehensive answers to user queries, ideally with accurate citations. However, in our experience of developing a RAG product, LLMs often struggle with source attribution, aligning with other industry studies reporting citation accuracy rates of only about 74% for popular generative search engines. To address this, we present efficient post-processing algorithms to improve citation accuracy in LLM-generated responses, with minimal impact on latency and cost. Our approaches cross-check generated citations against retrieved articles using methods including keyword + semantic matching, fine tuned model with BERTScore, and a lightweight LLM-based technique. Our experimental results demonstrate a relative improvement of 15.46% in the overall accuracy metrics of our RAG system. This significant enhancement potentially enables a shift from our current larger language model to a relatively smaller model that is approximately 12x more cost-effective and 3x faster in inference time, while maintaining comparable performance. This research contributes to enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of AI-generated content in information retrieval and summarization tasks which is critical to gain customer trust especially in commercial products.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

12 of 23 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
  4. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
  5. 2019Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Modelscited by 800
  6. 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 692
  7. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
  8. 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 303
  9. 2024Training Language Models to Generate Text with Citations via Fine-grained Rewardscited by 42
  10. 2024Measuring and Enhancing Trustworthiness of LLMs in RAG through Grounded Attributions and Learning to Refusecited by 34
  11. 2024CaLM: Contrasting Large and Small Language Models to Verify Grounded Generationcited by 11
  12. 2024FACTOID: FACtual enTailment fOr hallucInation Detectioncited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024On the Capacity of Citation Generation by Large Language Models
  2. 2025A Systematic Literature Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Techniques, Metrics, and Challenges
  3. 2025VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verification
  4. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Estimation of Source Reliability
  5. 2025Concise and Sufficient Sub-Sentence Citations for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  6. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  7. 2024RAG Foundry: A Framework for Enhancing LLMs for Retrieval Augmented Generation
  8. 2025ALoFTRAG: Automatic Local Fine Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Generation