Integrated Framework for LLM Evaluation with Answer Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable evaluation of large language models is essential to ensure their applicability in practical scenarios. Traditional benchmark-based evaluation methods often rely on fixed reference answers, limiting their ability to capture important qualitative aspects of generated responses. To address these shortcomings, we propose an integrated evaluation framework called textitself-refining descriptive evaluation with expert-driven diagnostics, SPEED, which utilizes specialized functional experts to perform comprehensive, descriptive analyses of model outputs. Unlike conventional approaches, SPEED actively incorporates expert feedback across multiple dimensions, including hallucination detection, toxicity assessment, and lexical-contextual appropriateness. Experimental results demonstrate that SPEED achieves robust and consistent evaluation performance across diverse domains and datasets. Additionally, by employing relatively compact expert models, SPEED demonstrates superior resource efficiency compared to larger-scale evaluators. These findings illustrate that SPEED significantly enhances fairness and interpretability in LLM evaluations, offering a promising alternative to existing evaluation methodologies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.
Builds on
31 of 44 references.
References · 31
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 861
19 more
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 575
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
- 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 341
- 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 326
- 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
- 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 285
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
- 2023PIXIU: A Large Language Model, Instruction Data and Evaluation Benchmark for Financecited by 222
- 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 217
- 2022ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answeringcited by 196
- 2019DREAM: A Challenge Dataset and Models for Dialogue-Based Reading Comprehensioncited by 156
- 2022FaithDial: A Faithful Benchmark for Information-Seeking Dialoguecited by 109
- 2024Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 106
- 2023FactCHD: Benchmarking Fact-Conflicting Hallucination Detectioncited by 29
- 2024Toxicity Classification in Ukrainiancited by 7
- 2025CLEV: LLM-Based Evaluation Through Lightweight Efficient Voting for Free-Form Question-Answeringcited by 6
- 2025HuDEx: Integrating Hallucination Detection and Explainability for Enhancing the Reliability of LLM responsescited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Enhancing LLM Evaluations: The Garbling Trick
- 2024Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate
- 2024DnA-Eval: Enhancing Large Language Model Evaluation through Decomposition and Aggregation
- 2025RocketEval: Efficient Automated LLM Evaluation via Grading Checklist
- 2025JudgeAgent: Beyond Static Benchmarks for Knowledge-Driven and Dynamic LLM Evaluation
- 2026EvalBuilder: Can LLMs Build Efficient Benchmarks?
- 2024Sample-Efficient Human Evaluation of Large Language Models via Maximum Discrepancy Competition
- 2026SCORE: Specificity, Context Utilization, Robustness, and Relevance for Reference-Free LLM Evaluation