JudgeAgent: Beyond Static Benchmarks for Knowledge-Driven and Dynamic LLM Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current evaluation methods for large language models (LLMs) primarily rely on static benchmarks, presenting two major challenges: limited knowledge coverage and fixed difficulties that mismatch with the evaluated LLMs. These limitations lead to superficial assessments of LLM knowledge, thereby impeding the targeted model optimizations. To bridge this gap, we propose JudgeAgent, a knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation framework for LLMs. To address the challenge of limited knowledge coverage, JudgeAgent leverages LLM agents equipped with context graphs to traverse knowledge structures systematically for question generation. Furthermore, to mitigate data contamination and difficulty mismatch, it adopts a difficulty-adaptive and multi-turn interview mechanism. Thereby, JudgeAgent can achieve comprehensive evaluations and facilitate more effective improvement of LLMs. Empirical results demonstrate that JudgeAgent enables more comprehensive evaluations and facilitates effective model iterations, highlighting the potential of this knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation paradigm. The source code is available on https://github.com/DataArcTech/JudgeAgent.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.
Builds on
19 of 32 references.
References · 19
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
- 2023MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedbackcited by 297
- 2024MultiHop-RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Queriescited by 257
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
7 more
- 2023Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examinercited by 172
- 2025Test-Time Preference Optimization: On-the-Fly Alignment via Iterative Textual Feedbackcited by 41
- 2024KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2024Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference Datacited by 32
- 2024LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 13
- 2024Hierarchical Deconstruction of LLM Reasoning: A Graph-Based Framework for Analyzing Knowledge Utilizationcited by 9
- 2025HypKG: Hypergraph-based Knowledge Graph Contextualization for Precision Healthcarecited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Multi-Agent LLM Judge: automatic personalized LLM judge design for evaluating natural language generation applications
- 2025Encyclo-K: Evaluating LLMs with Dynamically Composed Knowledge Statements
- 2024TestAgent: Automatic Benchmarking and Exploratory Interaction for Evaluating LLMs in Vertical Domains
- 2026EvalBuilder: Can LLMs Build Efficient Benchmarks?
- 2025Learned-Rule-Augmented Large Language Model Evaluators
- 2026Beyond Questions: Evaluating the Stated Knowledge of LLMs
- 2024Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate
- 2025Leveraging LLMs as Meta-Judges: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating LLM Judgments