From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models often struggle with idiomatic, figurative, or context-sensitive inputs, not because they produce flawed outputs, but because they misinterpret the input from the outset. We propose an input-only method for anticipating such failures using token-level likelihood features inspired by surprisal and the Uniform Information Density hypothesis. These features capture localized uncertainty in input comprehension and outperform standard baselines across five linguistically challenging datasets. We show that span-localized features improve error detection for larger models, while smaller models benefit from global patterns. Our method requires no access to outputs or hidden activations, offering a lightweight and generalizable approach to pre-generation error prediction.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.
Builds on
22 of 58 references.
References · 22
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
- 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 243
- 2024Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Mapscited by 142
- 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 77
- 2024PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs' Pragmatics Capabilitiescited by 59
- 2024Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Model Generation: A Token Probability Approachcited by 42
- 2023Transformer-Based Language Model Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokenscited by 41
10 more
- 2024On the Role of Context in Reading Time Predictioncited by 20
- 2022On the Effect of Anticipation on Reading Timescited by 19
- 2024Surprise! Uniform Information Density Isn't the Whole Story: Predicting Surprisal Contours in Long-form Discoursecited by 17
- 2024Sign of the Times: Evaluating the use of Large Language Models for Idiomaticity Detectioncited by 11
- 2024Rolling the DICE on Idiomaticity: How LLMs Fail to Grasp Contextcited by 11
- 2025Language Models Can Predict Their Own Behaviorcited by 8
- 2024Enhancing Idiomatic Representation in Multiple Languages via an Adaptive Contrastive Triplet Losscited by 7
- 2025Improve Decoding Factuality by Token-wise Cross Layer Entropy of Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025ConMeC: A Dataset for Metonymy Resolution with Common Nounscited by 4
- 2024Oddballness: universal anomaly detection with language modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.