ConMeC: A Dataset for Metonymy Resolution with Common Nouns
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Metonymy plays an important role in our daily communication. People naturally think about things using their most salient properties or commonly related concepts. For example, by saying "The bus decided to skip our stop today," we actually mean that the bus driver made the decision, not the bus. Prior work on metonymy resolution has mainly focused on named entities. However, metonymy involving common nouns (such as desk, baby, and school) is also a frequent and challenging phenomenon. We argue that NLP systems should be capable of identifying the metonymic use of common nouns in context. We create a new metonymy dataset ConMeC, which consists of 6,000 sentences, where each sentence is paired with a target common noun and annotated by humans to indicate whether that common noun is used metonymically or not in that context. We also introduce a chain-of-thought based prompting method for detecting metonymy using large language models (LLMs). We evaluate our LLM-based pipeline, as well as a supervised BERT model on our dataset and three other metonymy datasets. Our experimental results demonstrate that LLMs could achieve performance comparable to the supervised BERT model on well-defined metonymy categories, while still struggling with instances requiring nuanced semantic understanding. Our dataset is publicly available at: https://github.com/SaptGhosh/ConMeC.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.
Builds on
9 of 29 references.
References · 9
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 249
- 2023Just Ask One More Time! Self-Agreement Improves Reasoning of Language Models in (Almost) All Scenarioscited by 18
- 2025Enhancing Semantic Consistency of Large Language Models through Model Editing: An Interpretability-Oriented Approachcited by 14
- 2020Target Word Masking for Location Metonymy Resolutioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026A Computational Approach to Visual Metonymycited by 2
- 2025Evaluating the Impact of Verbal Multiword Expressions on Machine Translationcited by 1
- 2025From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errorscited by 1
- 2026Exploring Concreteness Through a Figurative Lenscited by 0
- 2026Exploring Concreteness Through a Figurative Lens20 Apr 2026
- 2026A Computational Approach to Visual Metonymy25 Jan 2026
- 2025From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errors24 Sep 2025
- 2025Evaluating the Impact of Verbal Multiword Expressions on Machine Translation24 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Can large language models understand uncommon meanings of common words?
- 2026SemBench: A Universal Semantic Framework for LLM Evaluation
- 2026Caliper: Probing Lexical Anchors versus Causal Structure in LLMs
- 2024Traffic Light or Light Traffic? Investigating Phrasal Semantics in Large Language Models
- 2024Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models
- 2026When a Name Is Not a Name: A Benchmark Dataset and Distilled Reasoning for Culturally Entangled Bangla Homographs in Low-Resource LLMs
- 2023Not wacky vs. definitely wacky: A study of scalar adverbs in pretrained language models
- 2023Human-machine cooperation for semantic feature listing