mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Language Models Can Predict Their Own Behavior

arXiv 2502.13329 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The text produced by language models (LMs) can exhibit specific `behaviors,' such as a failure to follow alignment training, that we hope to detect and react to during deployment. Identifying these behaviors can often only be done post facto, i.e., after the entire text of the output has been generated. We provide evidence that there are times when we can predict how an LM will behave early in computation, before even a single token is generated. We show that probes trained on the internal representation of input tokens alone can predict a wide range of eventual behaviors over the entire output sequence. Using methods from conformal prediction, we provide provable bounds on the estimation error of our probes, creating precise early warning systems for these behaviors. The conformal probes can identify instances that will trigger alignment failures (jailbreaking) and instruction-following failures, without requiring a single token to be generated. An early warning system built on the probes reduces jailbreaking by 91%. Our probes also show promise in pre-emptively estimating how confident the model will be in its response, a behavior that cannot be detected using the output text alone. Conformal probes can preemptively estimate the final prediction of an LM that uses Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, hence accelerating inference. When applied to an LM that uses CoT to perform text classification, the probes drastically reduce inference costs (65% on average across 27 datasets), with negligible accuracy loss. Encouragingly, probes generalize to unseen datasets and perform better on larger models, suggesting applicability to the largest of models in real-world settings.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 79 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

Builds on

79 of 104 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May
  2. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know11 Jul

Other references · 77

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  9. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  10. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  11. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  12. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
38 more
  1. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  3. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  7. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  8. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  9. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  10. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  11. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
  12. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  13. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  14. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  15. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  16. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  17. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  18. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  19. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  20. 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
  21. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
  22. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
  23. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  24. 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 525
  25. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
  26. 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 439
  27. 2020DeeBERT: Dynamic Early Exiting for Accelerating BERT Inferencecited by 322
  28. 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
  29. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 298
  30. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
  31. 2020BERT Loses Patience: Fast and Robust Inference with Early Exitcited by 267
  32. 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 248
  33. 2023Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 238
  34. 2019Depth-Adaptive Transformercited by 227
  35. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
  36. 2024WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Modelscited by 206
  37. 2024A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Modelscited by 197
  38. 2020CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate Claimscited by 195

50 most cited of 77 All 77 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Re-Emergent Misalignment: How Narrow Fine-Tuning Erodes Safety Alignment in LLMs
  2. 2025Preemptive Detection and Steering of LLM Misalignment via Latent Reachability
  3. 2026Probing the Misaligned Thinking Process of Language Models
  4. 2026Layerwise Convergence Fingerprints for Runtime Misbehavior Detection in Large Language Models
  5. 2026The Calls are Coming from Inside the Model: Investigating Probe-based Detection of Tool-Calling Errors in LLMs
  6. 2025Decoding One Safety Trigger Token for Balancing Safety and Usability in Large Language Models
  7. 2024CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data
  8. 2026Inference-Time Vulnerability Beyond Shallow Safety: Alignment Along Generation Trajectories