On the Role of Context in Reading Time Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a new perspective on how readers integrate context during real-time language comprehension. Our proposals build on surprisal theory, which posits that the processing effort of a linguistic unit (e.g., a word) is an affine function of its in-context information content. We first observe that surprisal is only one out of many potential ways that a contextual predictor can be derived from a language model. Another one is the pointwise mutual information (PMI) between a unit and its context, which turns out to yield the same predictive power as surprisal when controlling for unigram frequency. Moreover, both PMI and surprisal are correlated with frequency. This means that neither PMI nor surprisal contains information about context alone. In response to this, we propose a technique where we project surprisal onto the orthogonal complement of frequency, yielding a new contextual predictor that is uncorrelated with frequency. Our experiments show that the proportion of variance in reading times explained by context is a lot smaller when context is represented by the orthogonalized predictor. From an interpretability standpoint, this indicates that previous studies may have overstated the role that context has in predicting reading times.
Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2024.
Builds on
12 of 53 references.
References · 12
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2022mGPT: Few-Shot Learners Go Multilingualcited by 141
- 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 115
- 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
- 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 75
- 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 63
- 2021Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Likecited by 52
- 2023Transformer-Based Language Model Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokenscited by 39
- 2024Frequency Explains the Inverse Correlation of Large Language Models' Size, Training Data Amount, and Surprisal's Fit to Reading Timescited by 37
- 2022Context Limitations Make Neural Language Models More Human-Likecited by 32
- 2022A Measure-Theoretic Characterization of Tight Language Modelscited by 32
- 2021Modeling the Unigram Distributioncited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 8; 2026: 6.
17 papers.
Sort:
- 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internallycited by 28
- 2024Generalized Measures of Anticipation and Responsivity in Online Language Processingcited by 23
- 2024Surprise! Uniform Information Density Isn't the Whole Story: Predicting Surprisal Contours in Long-form Discoursecited by 14
- 2025Information Locality as an Inductive Bias for Neural Language Modelscited by 14
- 2025Language Model Behavioral Phases are Consistent Across Architecture, Training Data, and Scalecited by 13
- 2025Language Models Grow Less Humanlike beyond Phase Transitioncited by 10
- 2025A Distributional Perspective on Word Learning in Neural Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Strategic resource allocation in memory encoding: An efficiency principle shaping language processingcited by 2
- 2025A Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Fine-Grained Modeling of Reading Behaviorcited by 2
- 2026On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal Theorycited by 2
- 2024Reverse-Engineering the Readercited by 1
- 2025From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errorscited by 1
5 more
- 2026N-gram-like Language Models Predict Naturalistic Reading Time Bestcited by 1
- 2026To Words and Beyond: Probing Large Language Models for Sentence-Level Psycholinguistic Norms of Memorability and Reading Timescited by 0
- 2026Probing for Reading Timescited by 0
- 2026The Frequency Confound in Language-Model Surprisal and Metaphor Noveltycited by 0
- 2026Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)cited by 0
- 2026Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)23 Jul 2026
- 2026The Frequency Confound in Language-Model Surprisal and Metaphor Novelty7 May 2026
- 2026On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal Theory30 Apr 2026
- 2026Probing for Reading Times20 Apr 2026
- 2026To Words and Beyond: Probing Large Language Models for Sentence-Level Psycholinguistic Norms of Memorability and Reading Times12 Mar 2026
- 2026N-gram-like Language Models Predict Naturalistic Reading Time Best10 Mar 2026
- 2025Language Model Behavioral Phases are Consistent Across Architecture, Training Data, and Scale28 Oct 2025
- 2025From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errors24 Sep 2025
- 2025A Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Fine-Grained Modeling of Reading Behavior24 Jun 2025
- 2025Information Locality as an Inductive Bias for Neural Language Models5 Jun 2025
- 2025Strategic resource allocation in memory encoding: An efficiency principle shaping language processing18 Mar 2025
- 2025Language Models Grow Less Humanlike beyond Phase Transition26 Feb 2025
5 more
- 2025A Distributional Perspective on Word Learning in Neural Language Models9 Feb 2025
- 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internally3 Feb 2025
- 2024Surprise! Uniform Information Density Isn't the Whole Story: Predicting Surprisal Contours in Long-form Discourse21 Oct 2024
- 2024Reverse-Engineering the Reader16 Oct 2024
- 2024Generalized Measures of Anticipation and Responsivity in Online Language Processing16 Sep 2024
- 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internallycited by 28
- 2024Generalized Measures of Anticipation and Responsivity in Online Language Processingcited by 23
- 2024Surprise! Uniform Information Density Isn't the Whole Story: Predicting Surprisal Contours in Long-form Discoursecited by 14
- 2025Information Locality as an Inductive Bias for Neural Language Modelscited by 14
- 2025Language Model Behavioral Phases are Consistent Across Architecture, Training Data, and Scalecited by 13
- 2025Language Models Grow Less Humanlike beyond Phase Transitioncited by 10
- 2025A Distributional Perspective on Word Learning in Neural Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Strategic resource allocation in memory encoding: An efficiency principle shaping language processingcited by 2
- 2025A Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Fine-Grained Modeling of Reading Behaviorcited by 2
- 2026On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal Theorycited by 2
- 2024Reverse-Engineering the Readercited by 1
- 2025From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errorscited by 1
12 most cited of 17 All 17 (JSON)
- 2026Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)23 Jul 2026
- 2026The Frequency Confound in Language-Model Surprisal and Metaphor Novelty7 May 2026
- 2026On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal Theory30 Apr 2026
- 2026Probing for Reading Times20 Apr 2026
- 2026To Words and Beyond: Probing Large Language Models for Sentence-Level Psycholinguistic Norms of Memorability and Reading Times12 Mar 2026
- 2026N-gram-like Language Models Predict Naturalistic Reading Time Best10 Mar 2026
- 2025Language Model Behavioral Phases are Consistent Across Architecture, Training Data, and Scale28 Oct 2025
- 2025From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become Errors24 Sep 2025
- 2025A Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Fine-Grained Modeling of Reading Behavior24 Jun 2025
- 2025Information Locality as an Inductive Bias for Neural Language Models5 Jun 2025
- 2025Strategic resource allocation in memory encoding: An efficiency principle shaping language processing18 Mar 2025
- 2025Language Models Grow Less Humanlike beyond Phase Transition26 Feb 2025
12 newest of 17 All 17 (JSON)