mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Role of Context in Reading Time Prediction

arXiv 2409.08160 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a new perspective on how readers integrate context during real-time language comprehension. Our proposals build on surprisal theory, which posits that the processing effort of a linguistic unit (e.g., a word) is an affine function of its in-context information content. We first observe that surprisal is only one out of many potential ways that a contextual predictor can be derived from a language model. Another one is the pointwise mutual information (PMI) between a unit and its context, which turns out to yield the same predictive power as surprisal when controlling for unigram frequency. Moreover, both PMI and surprisal are correlated with frequency. This means that neither PMI nor surprisal contains information about context alone. In response to this, we propose a technique where we project surprisal onto the orthogonal complement of frequency, yielding a new contextual predictor that is uncorrelated with frequency. Our experiments show that the proportion of variance in reading times explained by context is a lot smaller when context is represented by the orthogonalized predictor. From an interpretability standpoint, this indicates that previous studies may have overstated the role that context has in predicting reading times.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2024.

Builds on

12 of 53 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2022mGPT: Few-Shot Learners Go Multilingualcited by 141
  3. 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 115
  4. 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
  5. 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 75
  6. 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 63
  7. 2021Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Likecited by 52
  8. 2023Transformer-Based Language Model Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokenscited by 39
  9. 2024Frequency Explains the Inverse Correlation of Large Language Models' Size, Training Data Amount, and Surprisal's Fit to Reading Timescited by 37
  10. 2022Context Limitations Make Neural Language Models More Human-Likecited by 32
  11. 2022A Measure-Theoretic Characterization of Tight Language Modelscited by 32
  12. 2021Modeling the Unigram Distributioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 8; 2026: 6.

17 papers.

Sort: