mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Aerial-Ground Image Feature Matching via 3D Gaussian Splatting-based Intermediate View Rendering

arXiv 2509.19898 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The integration of aerial and ground images has been a promising solution in 3D modeling of complex scenes, which is seriously restricted by finding reliable correspondences. The primary contribution of this study is a feature matching algorithm for aerial and ground images, whose core idea is to generate intermediate views to alleviate perspective distortions caused by the extensive viewpoint changes. First, by using aerial images only, sparse models are reconstructed through an incremental SfM (Structure from Motion) engine due to their large scene coverage. Second, 3D Gaussian Splatting is then adopted for scene rendering by taking as inputs sparse points and oriented images. For accurate view rendering, a render viewpoint determination algorithm is designed by using the oriented camera poses of aerial images, which is used to generate high-quality intermediate images that can bridge the gap between aerial and ground images. Third, with the aid of intermediate images, reliable feature matching is conducted for match pairs from render-aerial and render-ground images, and final matches can be generated by transmitting correspondences through intermediate views. By using real aerial and ground datasets, the validation of the proposed solution has been verified in terms of feature matching and scene rendering and compared comprehensively with widely used methods. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed solution can provide reliable feature matches for aerial and ground images with an obvious increase in the number of initial and refined matches, and it can provide enough matches to achieve accurate ISfM reconstruction and complete 3DGS-based scene rendering.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

16 of 47 references.

References · 16

  1. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
  2. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  3. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
  4. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
  5. 2019D2-Net: A Trainable CNN for Joint Detection and Description of Local Featurescited by 326
  6. 2024No Pose, No Problem: Surprisingly Simple 3D Gaussian Splats from Sparse Unposed Imagescited by 248
  7. 2017Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning losscited by 212
  8. 2022ASpanFormer: Detector-Free Image Matching with Adaptive Span Transformercited by 171
  9. 2020ASLFeat: Learning Local Features of Accurate Shape and Localizationcited by 130
  10. 2022MatchFormer: Interleaving Attention in Transformers for Feature Matchingcited by 126
  11. 2019ContextDesc: Local Descriptor Augmentation with Cross-Modality Contextcited by 79
  12. 2024PF3plat: Pose-Free Feed-Forward 3D Gaussian Splattingcited by 62
4 more
  1. 2018GeoDesc: Learning Local Descriptors by Integrating Geometry Constraintscited by 52
  2. 2024Local Feature Matching Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 26
  3. 2020Leveraging Photogrammetric Mesh Models for Aerial-Ground Feature Point Matching Toward Integrated 3D Reconstructioncited by 10
  4. 2022Optimized Views Photogrammetry: Precision Analysis and A Large-scale Case Study in Qingdaocited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.