mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FedFiTS: Fitness-Selected, Slotted Client Scheduling for Trustworthy Federated Learning in Healthcare AI

arXiv 2509.19120 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for privacy-preserving model training, yet deployments in sensitive domains such as healthcare face persistent challenges from non-IID data, client unreliability, and adversarial manipulation. This paper introduces FedFiTS, a trust and fairness-aware selective FL framework that advances the FedFaSt line by combining fitness-based client election with slotted aggregation. FedFiTS implements a three-phase participation strategy-free-for-all training, natural selection, and slotted team participation-augmented with dynamic client scoring, adaptive thresholding, and cohort-based scheduling to balance convergence efficiency with robustness. A theoretical convergence analysis establishes bounds for both convex and non-convex objectives under standard assumptions, while a communication-complexity analysis shows reductions relative to FedAvg and other baselines. Experiments on diverse datasets-medical imaging (X-ray pneumonia), vision benchmarks (MNIST, FMNIST), and tabular agricultural data (Crop Recommendation)-demonstrate that FedFiTS consistently outperforms FedAvg, FedRand, and FedPow in accuracy, time-to-target, and resilience to poisoning attacks. By integrating trust-aware aggregation with fairness-oriented client selection, FedFiTS advances scalable and secure FL, making it well suited for real-world healthcare and cross-domain deployments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  3. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  4. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
  5. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 394
  6. 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 352
  7. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
  8. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 346
  9. 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
  10. 2019SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learningcited by 175

Built on by

Not cited yet.