Every Question Has Its Own Value: Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Human Values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Human Values (RLEV), a method that aligns Large Language Model (LLM) optimization directly with quantifiable human value signals. While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) effectively trains models in objective domains using binary correctness rewards, it overlooks that not all tasks are equally significant. RLEV extends this framework by incorporating human-defined value signals directly into the reward function. Using exam-style data with explicit ground-truth value labels, RLEV consistently outperforms correctness-only baselines across multiple RL algorithms and model scales. Crucially, RLEV policies not only improve value-weighted accuracy but also learn a value-sensitive termination policy: concise for low-value prompts, thorough for high-value ones. We demonstrate this behavior stems from value-weighted gradient amplification on end-of-sequence tokens. Ablation studies confirm the gain is causally linked to value alignment. RLEV remains robust under noisy value signals, such as difficulty-based labels, demonstrating that optimizing for an explicit utility function offers a practical path to aligning LLMs with human priorities.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.
Builds on
18 of 25 references.
References · 18
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 236
6 more
- 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domainscited by 150
- 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domainscited by 132
- 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 107
- 2025One Token to Fool LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 56
- 2018Importance Weighted Transfer of Samples in Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.