SLAyiNG: A Diverse and Community-validated Dataset of Queer Slang
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Queer vernacular is rarely studied in NLP, despite advancements in resources and evaluation for other sociolects and informal language. Because of this, NLP systems often process queer language incorrectly, e.g., they misclassify it as hate speech or generate negative responses. To address this problem, we propose Slaying, the first real-world dataset of English queer slang. Slaying is community-validated, and includes over 500 queer slang terms that pertain to more than 20 queer subcommunities. We argue that queer language data resources have great potential in NLP -- e.g., as components of large pretraining corpora and as the basis for benchmarks -- and can improve queer users' experience of NLP systems. We leverage Slaying for two novel findings in support of this argument: (i) For a number of language models, we show that they are unbiased towards the queer community, but at the same time unable to process its language, i.e., absence of representation bias does not entail the absence of linguistic bias. (ii) Model performance on queer slang varies across queer subcommunities; it is generally worse for slang pertaining to African-American and Latine communities. These findings are relevant for both the queer NLP and the broader ML communities. Slaying is available to the public, and open to future revisions and extensions. Warning: This paper contains profane and potentially offensive language.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
24 of 72 references.
References · 24
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
- 2021Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologiescited by 128
- 2019Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolutioncited by 84
- 2023Paloma: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Model Fitcited by 54
- 2020Investigating African-American Vernacular English in Transformer-Based Text Generationcited by 53
- 2023MISGENDERED: Limits of Large Language Models in Understanding Pronounscited by 43
- 2023WinoQueer: A Community-in-the-Loop Benchmark for Anti-LGBTQ+ Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2023Analyzing Dataset Annotation Quality Management in the Wildcited by 41
- 2025DataDecide: How to Predict Best Pretraining Data with Small Experimentscited by 40
- 2023Evaluation of African American Language Bias in Natural Language Generationcited by 36
- 2020Mind Your Inflections! Improving NLP for Non-Standard Englishes with Base-Inflection Encodingcited by 22
12 more
- 2024Assessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Taskscited by 22
- 2024SLANG: New Concept Comprehension of Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2024Robust Pronoun Fidelity with English LLMs: Are they Reasoning, Repeating, or Just Biased?cited by 17
- 2024Harmful Speech Detection by Language Models Exhibits Gender-Queer Dialect Biascited by 16
- 2024AAVENUE: Detecting LLM Biases on NLU Tasks in AAVE via a Novel Benchmarkcited by 11
- 2021Making Online Communities 'Better': A Taxonomy of Community Values on Redditcited by 10
- 2025Not Like Us, Hunty: Measuring Perceptions and Behavioral Effects of Minoritized Anthropomorphic Cues in LLMscited by 9
- 2022Detecting Harmful Online Conversational Content towards LGBTQIA+ Individualscited by 8
- 2022"It's Not Just Hate'': A Multi-Dimensional Perspective on Detecting Harmful Speech Onlinecited by 7
- 2024Toward Informal Language Processing: Knowledge of Slang in Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2023Non-Binary Gender Expression in Online Interactionscited by 5
- 2024Beyond the binary: Limitations and possibilities of gender-related speech technology researchcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.