"It's Not Just Hate'': A Multi-Dimensional Perspective on Detecting Harmful Speech Online
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Well-annotated data is a prerequisite for good Natural Language Processing models. Too often, though, annotation decisions are governed by optimizing time or annotator agreement. We make a case for nuanced efforts in an interdisciplinary setting for annotating offensive online speech. Detecting offensive content is rapidly becoming one of the most important real-world NLP tasks. However, most datasets use a single binary label, e.g., for hate or incivility, even though each concept is multi-faceted. This modeling choice severely limits nuanced insights, but also performance. We show that a more fine-grained multi-label approach to predicting incivility and hateful or intolerant content addresses both conceptual and performance issues. We release a novel dataset of over 40,000 tweets about immigration from the US and UK, annotated with six labels for different aspects of incivility and intolerance. Our dataset not only allows for a more nuanced understanding of harmful speech online, models trained on it also outperform or match performance on benchmark datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2022.
Builds on
10 of 28 references.
References · 10
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
- 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
- 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
- 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
- 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 139
- 2022Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Modelscited by 115
- 2020ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Datasetcited by 66
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Cultural Compass: Predicting Transfer Learning Success in Offensive Language Detection with Cultural Featurescited by 18
- 2023Social-LLM: Modeling User Behavior at Scale using Language Models and Social Network Datacited by 11
- 2024Beyond Hate Speech: NLP's Challenges and Opportunities in Uncovering Dehumanizing Languagecited by 2
- 2025Improving Harmful Text Detection with Joint Retrieval and External Knowledgecited by 2
- 2023Improving Cross-Domain Hate Speech Generalizability with Emotion Knowledgecited by 1
- 2025SLAyiNG: A Diverse and Community-validated Dataset of Queer Slangcited by 1
- 2026Evaluating Criterion-Conditioned Behaviour of Large Language Models in Content Moderationcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Criterion-Conditioned Behaviour of Large Language Models in Content Moderation3 Sep 2026
- 2025SLAyiNG: A Diverse and Community-validated Dataset of Queer Slang22 Sep 2025
- 2025Improving Harmful Text Detection with Joint Retrieval and External Knowledge3 Apr 2025
- 2024Beyond Hate Speech: NLP's Challenges and Opportunities in Uncovering Dehumanizing Language21 Feb 2024
- 2023Social-LLM: Modeling User Behavior at Scale using Language Models and Social Network Data31 Dec 2023
- 2023Improving Cross-Domain Hate Speech Generalizability with Emotion Knowledge24 Nov 2023
- 2023Cultural Compass: Predicting Transfer Learning Success in Offensive Language Detection with Cultural Features10 Oct 2023