SVeritas: Benchmark for Robust Speaker Verification under Diverse Conditions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Speaker verification (SV) models are increasingly integrated into security, personalization, and access control systems, yet their robustness to many real-world challenges remains inadequately benchmarked. These include a variety of natural and maliciously created conditions causing signal degradations or mismatches between enrollment and test data, impacting performance. Existing benchmarks evaluate only subsets of these conditions, missing others entirely. We introduce SVeritas, a comprehensive Speaker Verification tasks benchmark suite, assessing SV systems under stressors like recording duration, spontaneity, content, noise, microphone distance, reverberation, channel mismatches, audio bandwidth, codecs, speaker age, and susceptibility to spoofing and adversarial attacks. While several benchmarks do exist that each cover some of these issues, SVeritas is the first comprehensive evaluation that not only includes all of these, but also several other entirely new, but nonetheless important, real-life conditions that have not previously been benchmarked. We use SVeritas to evaluate several state-of-the-art SV models and observe that while some architectures maintain stability under common distortions, they suffer substantial performance degradation in scenarios involving cross-language trials, age mismatches, and codec-induced compression. Extending our analysis across demographic subgroups, we further identify disparities in robustness across age groups, gender, and linguistic backgrounds. By standardizing evaluation under realistic and synthetic stress conditions, SVeritas enables precise diagnosis of model weaknesses and establishes a foundation for advancing equitable and reliable speaker verification systems.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2025.
Builds on
25 of 56 references.
References · 25
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,657
- 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,384
- 2021SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 666
- 2020ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verificationcited by 628
- 2024CosyVoice: A Scalable Multilingual Zero-shot Text-to-speech Synthesizer based on Supervised Semantic Tokenscited by 334
- 2019Who is Real Bob? Adversarial Attacks on Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 67
- 2024EARS: An Anechoic Fullband Speech Dataset Benchmarked for Speech Enhancement and Dereverberationcited by 64
- 2018Did you hear that? Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 48
- 2022MFA-Conformer: Multi-scale Feature Aggregation Conformer for Automatic Speaker Verificationcited by 47
- 2022IndicSUPERB: A Speech Processing Universal Performance Benchmark for Indian languagescited by 40
- 2024Reshape Dimensions Network for Speaker Recognitioncited by 28
13 more
- 2020VoxSRC 2020: The Second VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challengecited by 27
- 2024ECAPA2: A Hybrid Neural Network Architecture and Training Strategy for Robust Speaker Embeddingscited by 22
- 2020Adversarial Attack and Defense Strategies for Deep Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 21
- 2024Speech Robust Bench: A Robustness Benchmark For Speech Recognitioncited by 21
- 2020Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Generalized Contrastive Loss and Its Application to Speaker Recognitioncited by 19
- 2020The INTERSPEECH 2020 Far-Field Speaker Verification Challengecited by 11
- 2022The 2021 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluationcited by 10
- 2019Short-duration Speaker Verification (SdSV) Challenge 2021: the Challenge Evaluation Plancited by 9
- 2023VoxBlink: A Large Scale Speaker Verification Dataset on Cameracited by 9
- 2021MultiSV: Dataset for Far-Field Multi-Channel Speaker Verificationcited by 3
- 2023A Study on Bias and Fairness In Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 2
- 2024Disentangled Representation Learning for Environment-agnostic Speaker Recognitioncited by 2
- 2025From Dialect Gaps to Identity Maps: Tackling Variability in Speaker Verificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025DELULU: Discriminative Embedding Learning Using Latent Units for Speaker-Aware Self-Trained Speech Foundational Modelcited by 1
- 2026What and When to Learn: CURriculum Ranking Loss for Large-Scale Speaker Verificationcited by 1
- 2026POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plancited by 1
- 2026The Voiceprint Fallacy: Why Voices Are Not Unique Biometric Imprintscited by 0
- 2026Inquesto Score: A reliability Protocol For Voice Agentscited by 0
- 2026InterBias-SV: Compound Conditions in Speaker Verificationcited by 0
- 2026InterBias-SV: Compound Conditions in Speaker Verification29 Sep 2026
- 2026Inquesto Score: A reliability Protocol For Voice Agents24 Sep 2026
- 2026The Voiceprint Fallacy: Why Voices Are Not Unique Biometric Imprints8 Aug 2026
- 2026POLY-SIM: Polyglot Speaker Identification with Missing Modality Grand Challenge 2026 Evaluation Plan25 Mar 2026
- 2026What and When to Learn: CURriculum Ranking Loss for Large-Scale Speaker Verification25 Mar 2026
- 2025DELULU: Discriminative Embedding Learning Using Latent Units for Speaker-Aware Self-Trained Speech Foundational Model20 Oct 2025