mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GPO: Learning from Critical Steps to Improve LLM Reasoning

arXiv 2509.16456 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 10

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in various domains, showing impressive potential on different tasks. Recently, reasoning LLMs have been proposed to improve the textitreasoning or textitthinking capabilities of LLMs to solve complex problems. Despite the promising results of reasoning LLMs, enhancing the multi-step reasoning capabilities of LLMs still remains a significant challenge. While existing optimization methods have advanced the LLM reasoning capabilities, they often treat reasoning trajectories as a whole, without considering the underlying critical steps within the trajectory. In this paper, we introduce Guided Pivotal Optimization (GPO), a novel fine-tuning strategy that dives into the reasoning process to enable more effective improvements. GPO first identifies the `critical step' within a reasoning trajectory - a point that the model must carefully proceed to succeed at the problem. We locate the critical step by estimating the advantage function. GPO then resets the policy to the critical step, samples the new rollout and prioritizes the learning process on those rollouts. This focus allows the model to learn more effectively from pivotal moments within the reasoning process to improve the reasoning performance. We demonstrate that GPO is a general strategy that can be integrated with various optimization methods to improve reasoning performance. Besides theoretical analysis, our experiments across challenging reasoning benchmarks show that GPO can consistently and significantly enhance the performance of existing optimization methods, showcasing its effectiveness and generalizability in improving LLM reasoning by concentrating on pivotal moments within the generation process.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 40 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2025.

Builds on

40 of 72 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  2. 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning17 Jan

Other references · 38

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  7. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  8. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  9. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  10. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  11. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  12. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 735
26 more
  1. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  2. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 557
  3. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 487
  4. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 461
  5. 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 427
  6. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
  7. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 292
  8. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMscited by 273
  9. 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
  10. 2024VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMscited by 183
  11. 2024DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 163
  12. 2023MiniLLM: On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Modelscited by 139
  13. 2025BIG-Bench Extra Hardcited by 125
  14. 2024Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planningcited by 97
  15. 2024Planning In Natural Language Improves LLM Search For Code Generationcited by 83
  16. 2025Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Searchcited by 53
  17. 2025First Return, Entropy-Eliciting Explorecited by 45
  18. 2025Teaching Language Models to Critique via Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
  19. 2024Dataset Reset Policy Optimization for RLHFcited by 41
  20. 2022Learning Math Reasoning from Self-Sampled Correct and Partially-Correct Solutionscited by 38
  21. 2024Unleashing LLM Reasoning Capability via Scalable Question Synthesis from Scratchcited by 24
  22. 2023Harnessing Mixed Offline Reinforcement Learning Datasets via Trajectory Weightingcited by 22
  23. 2023Exploring Self-supervised Logic-enhanced Training for Large Language Modelscited by 8
  24. 2022Lazy-MDPs: Towards Interpretable Reinforcement Learning by Learning When to Actcited by 7
  25. 2024RICE: Breaking Through the Training Bottlenecks of Reinforcement Learning with Explanationcited by 7
  26. 2025Active Advantage-Aligned Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datacited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 8.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Deciphering Trajectory-Aided LLM Reasoning: An Optimization Perspective
  2. 2025Revisiting LLM Reasoning via Information Bottleneck
  3. 2025CARFT: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Contrastive Learning with Annotated Chain-of-Thought-based Reinforced Fine-Tuning
  4. 2024LLM Reasoners: New Evaluation, Library, and Analysis of Step-by-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models
  5. 2024CPL: Critical Plan Step Learning Boosts LLM Generalization in Reasoning Tasks
  6. 2025Bridging the Reasoning Gap: Small LLMs Can Plan with Generalised Strategies
  7. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains
  8. 2024Towards LLM-based optimization compilers. Can LLMs learn how to apply a single peephole optimization? Reasoning is all LLMs need!