GPO: Learning from Critical Steps to Improve LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in various domains, showing impressive potential on different tasks. Recently, reasoning LLMs have been proposed to improve the textitreasoning or textitthinking capabilities of LLMs to solve complex problems. Despite the promising results of reasoning LLMs, enhancing the multi-step reasoning capabilities of LLMs still remains a significant challenge. While existing optimization methods have advanced the LLM reasoning capabilities, they often treat reasoning trajectories as a whole, without considering the underlying critical steps within the trajectory. In this paper, we introduce Guided Pivotal Optimization (GPO), a novel fine-tuning strategy that dives into the reasoning process to enable more effective improvements. GPO first identifies the `critical step' within a reasoning trajectory - a point that the model must carefully proceed to succeed at the problem. We locate the critical step by estimating the advantage function. GPO then resets the policy to the critical step, samples the new rollout and prioritizes the learning process on those rollouts. This focus allows the model to learn more effectively from pivotal moments within the reasoning process to improve the reasoning performance. We demonstrate that GPO is a general strategy that can be integrated with various optimization methods to improve reasoning performance. Besides theoretical analysis, our experiments across challenging reasoning benchmarks show that GPO can consistently and significantly enhance the performance of existing optimization methods, showcasing its effectiveness and generalizability in improving LLM reasoning by concentrating on pivotal moments within the generation process.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 40 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2025.
Builds on
40 of 72 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
- 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning17 Jan
Other references · 38
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
- 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 735
26 more
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 557
- 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 487
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 461
- 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 427
- 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
- 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 292
- 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMscited by 273
- 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
- 2024VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMscited by 183
- 2024DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 163
- 2023MiniLLM: On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Modelscited by 139
- 2025BIG-Bench Extra Hardcited by 125
- 2024Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planningcited by 97
- 2024Planning In Natural Language Improves LLM Search For Code Generationcited by 83
- 2025Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Searchcited by 53
- 2025First Return, Entropy-Eliciting Explorecited by 45
- 2025Teaching Language Models to Critique via Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
- 2024Dataset Reset Policy Optimization for RLHFcited by 41
- 2022Learning Math Reasoning from Self-Sampled Correct and Partially-Correct Solutionscited by 38
- 2024Unleashing LLM Reasoning Capability via Scalable Question Synthesis from Scratchcited by 24
- 2023Harnessing Mixed Offline Reinforcement Learning Datasets via Trajectory Weightingcited by 22
- 2023Exploring Self-supervised Logic-enhanced Training for Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2022Lazy-MDPs: Towards Interpretable Reinforcement Learning by Learning When to Actcited by 7
- 2024RICE: Breaking Through the Training Bottlenecks of Reinforcement Learning with Explanationcited by 7
- 2025Active Advantage-Aligned Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datacited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 8.
10 papers.
- 2025The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic Viewcited by 13
- 2026TRIM: Hybrid Inference via Targeted Stepwise Routing in Multi-Step Reasoning Taskscited by 8
- 2025AIR: Post-training Data Selection for Reasoning via Attention Head Influencecited by 3
- 2026Stabilizing Unsupervised Self-Evolution of MLLMs via Continuous Softened Retracing reSamplingcited by 3
- 2026Believe Your Model: Distribution-Guided Confidence Calibrationcited by 2
- 2026Skip-Connected Policy Optimization for Implicit Advantagecited by 1
- 2026IsoSci: A Benchmark of Isomorphic Cross-Domain Science Problems for Evaluating Reasoning versus Knowledge Retrieval in LLMscited by 0
- 2026Learning Where Outcomes Change:Credit-Addressable Reasoning for Multimodal Geometrycited by 0
- 2026Tracking the Moving Frontier: Long-Short Term Advantage Estimatorcited by 0
- 2026Reflective Recovery: A Self-Supervised Method for Reasoning by Learning from Mistakescited by 0
- 2026Tracking the Moving Frontier: Long-Short Term Advantage Estimator6 Sep 2026
- 2026Learning Where Outcomes Change:Credit-Addressable Reasoning for Multimodal Geometry31 Aug 2026
- 2026Reflective Recovery: A Self-Supervised Method for Reasoning by Learning from Mistakes24 Jul 2026
- 2026IsoSci: A Benchmark of Isomorphic Cross-Domain Science Problems for Evaluating Reasoning versus Knowledge Retrieval in LLMs1 Jul 2026
- 2026Skip-Connected Policy Optimization for Implicit Advantage9 Apr 2026
- 2026Stabilizing Unsupervised Self-Evolution of MLLMs via Continuous Softened Retracing reSampling4 Apr 2026
- 2026Believe Your Model: Distribution-Guided Confidence Calibration4 Mar 2026
- 2026TRIM: Hybrid Inference via Targeted Stepwise Routing in Multi-Step Reasoning Tasks15 Jan 2026
- 2025AIR: Post-training Data Selection for Reasoning via Attention Head Influence15 Dec 2025
- 2025The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic View5 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Deciphering Trajectory-Aided LLM Reasoning: An Optimization Perspective
- 2025Revisiting LLM Reasoning via Information Bottleneck
- 2025CARFT: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Contrastive Learning with Annotated Chain-of-Thought-based Reinforced Fine-Tuning
- 2024LLM Reasoners: New Evaluation, Library, and Analysis of Step-by-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2024CPL: Critical Plan Step Learning Boosts LLM Generalization in Reasoning Tasks
- 2025Bridging the Reasoning Gap: Small LLMs Can Plan with Generalised Strategies
- 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains
- 2024Towards LLM-based optimization compilers. Can LLMs learn how to apply a single peephole optimization? Reasoning is all LLMs need!