mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MechaTerp-TRACE: A Novel Approach for Component Ablation Analysis in Language Models

arXiv 2609.22163 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretability research on large language models has produced accounts of factual recall in feed-forward layers and of token relationships in self-attention, but little work offers a unified way to compare the causal contribution of different architecture components to a model's output. We introduce MechaTerp (the Mechanistic Interpretability suite) -TRACE (subset for Teacher-forced Registry of Ablated Component Effects), an architecture and study that measures how much each registered component of a language model supports the production of a named entity. TRACE ablates one component at a time and measures the resulting change in the output distribution at a fixed answer token, so component types from whole transformer blocks down to individual neurons and output logits can be compared on a common scale. We apply it to thirteen instruction-tuned dense decoder models spanning five families and one to thirty billion parameters, ablating 49,656 components across 48 medical and 42 general-knowledge prompts. We find that the components carrying the most effect are the same few, positionally fixed components in every model, regardless of which entity a prompt asks about, and that once these are removed, the remaining support is close to evenly spread in eleven of the thirteen models. Apparent localisation of entity knowledge is therefore largely attributable to generic generation machinery, which has direct consequences for methods that assume entity knowledge sits in a findable place, including targeted knowledge editing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 6 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  2. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  3. 2023PMET: Precise Model Editing in a Transformercited by 173

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TRACE: Training and Inference-Time Interpretability Analysis for Language Models
  2. 2025Interpreting Language Models Through Concept Descriptions: A Survey
  3. 2026Representation as a Bottleneck for Mechanistic Interpretability: The Manifestation Unit Protocol
  4. 2026Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models
  5. 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computations
  6. 2024Extracting Interpretable Task-Specific Circuits from Large Language Models for Faster Inference
  7. 2026Causally Grounded Mechanistic Interpretability for LLMs with Faithful Natural-Language Explanations
  8. 2026MechELK: A Mechanistic Interpretability Framework for Eliciting Latent Knowledge in Large Language Models