mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic JWT: A Secure Delegation Protocol for Autonomous AI Agents

arXiv 2509.13597 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous LLM agents can issue thousands of API calls per hour without human oversight. OAuth 2.0 assumes deterministic clients, but in agentic settings stochastic reasoning, prompt injection, or multi-agent orchestration can silently expand privileges. We introduce Agentic JWT (A-JWT), a dual-faceted intent token that binds each agent's action to verifiable user intent and, optionally, to a specific workflow step. A-JWT carries an agent's identity as a one-way checksum hash derived from its prompt, tools and configuration, and a chained delegation assertion to prove which downstream agent may execute a given task, and per-agent proof-of-possession keys to prevent replay and in-process impersonation. We define a new authorization mechanism and add a lightweight client shim library that self-verifies code at run time, mints intent tokens, tracks workflow steps and derives keys, thus enabling secure agent identity and separation even within a single process. We illustrate a comprehensive threat model for agentic applications, implement a Python proof-of-concept and show functional blocking of scope-violating requests, replay, impersonation, and prompt-injection pathways with sub-millisecond overhead on commodity hardware. The design aligns with ongoing OAuth agent discussions and offers a drop-in path toward zero-trust guarantees for agentic applications. A comprehensive performance and security evaluation with experimental results will appear in our forthcoming journal publication

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.

Builds on

7 of 52 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  4. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  5. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  6. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
  7. 2022Attestation Mechanisms for Trusted Execution Environments Demystifiedcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents
  2. 2026HDP: A Lightweight Cryptographic Protocol for Human Delegation Provenance in Agentic AI Systems
  3. 2026Delegation Without Trust: An Empirical Gap Analysis of Identity, Authorization, and Runtime Governance in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  4. 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
  5. 2026AIP: Agent Identity Protocol for Verifiable Delegation Across MCP and A2A
  6. 2026Overlaying Governance: A Compositional Authorization Framework for Delegation and Scope in Agentic AI
  7. 2026Cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: a falsifiable hypothesis and proof of concept
  8. 2026SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems