Agentic JWT: A Secure Delegation Protocol for Autonomous AI Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous LLM agents can issue thousands of API calls per hour without human oversight. OAuth 2.0 assumes deterministic clients, but in agentic settings stochastic reasoning, prompt injection, or multi-agent orchestration can silently expand privileges. We introduce Agentic JWT (A-JWT), a dual-faceted intent token that binds each agent's action to verifiable user intent and, optionally, to a specific workflow step. A-JWT carries an agent's identity as a one-way checksum hash derived from its prompt, tools and configuration, and a chained delegation assertion to prove which downstream agent may execute a given task, and per-agent proof-of-possession keys to prevent replay and in-process impersonation. We define a new authorization mechanism and add a lightweight client shim library that self-verifies code at run time, mints intent tokens, tracks workflow steps and derives keys, thus enabling secure agent identity and separation even within a single process. We illustrate a comprehensive threat model for agentic applications, implement a Python proof-of-concept and show functional blocking of scope-violating requests, replay, impersonation, and prompt-injection pathways with sub-millisecond overhead on commodity hardware. The design aligns with ongoing OAuth agent discussions and offers a drop-in path toward zero-trust guarantees for agentic applications. A comprehensive performance and security evaluation with experimental results will appear in our forthcoming journal publication
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.
Builds on
7 of 52 references.
References · 7
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
- 2022Attestation Mechanisms for Trusted Execution Environments Demystifiedcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commercecited by 8
- 2026TessPay: Verify-then-Pay Infrastructure for Trusted Agentic Commercecited by 4
- 2026Agent-Fence: Mapping Security Vulnerabilities Across Deep Research Agentscited by 3
- 2026Heartbeat-Bound Hierarchical Credentials: Cryptographic Revocation for AI Agent Swarmscited by 3
- 2026SUDP: Secret-Use Delegation Protocol for Agentic Systemscited by 2
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systemscited by 1
- 2026Digital Identity for Agentic Systems: Toward a Portable Authorization Standard for Autonomous Agentscited by 0
- 2026Provably Secure Agent Guardrailcited by 0
- 2026TessIndex: Capability Verified Identity System for the Agent Economycited by 0
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems1 Sep 2026
- 2026TessIndex: Capability Verified Identity System for the Agent Economy22 Aug 2026
- 2026Provably Secure Agent Guardrail28 May 2026
- 2026Heartbeat-Bound Hierarchical Credentials: Cryptographic Revocation for AI Agent Swarms20 May 2026
- 2026Digital Identity for Agentic Systems: Toward a Portable Authorization Standard for Autonomous Agents12 May 2026
- 2026SUDP: Secret-Use Delegation Protocol for Agentic Systems27 Apr 2026
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce15 Apr 2026
- 2026Agent-Fence: Mapping Security Vulnerabilities Across Deep Research Agents7 Feb 2026
- 2026TessPay: Verify-then-Pay Infrastructure for Trusted Agentic Commerce30 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents
- 2026HDP: A Lightweight Cryptographic Protocol for Human Delegation Provenance in Agentic AI Systems
- 2026Delegation Without Trust: An Empirical Gap Analysis of Identity, Authorization, and Runtime Governance in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
- 2026AIP: Agent Identity Protocol for Verifiable Delegation Across MCP and A2A
- 2026Overlaying Governance: A Compositional Authorization Framework for Delegation and Scope in Agentic AI
- 2026Cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: a falsifiable hypothesis and proof of concept
- 2026SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems