mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dense-Jump Flow Matching with Non-Uniform Time Scheduling for Robotic Policies: Mitigating Multi-Step Inference Degradation

arXiv 2509.13574 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

Abstract (arXiv)

Flow matching has emerged as a competitive framework for learning high-quality generative policies in robotics; however, we find that generalisation arises and saturates early along the flow trajectory, in accordance with recent findings in the literature. We further observe that increasing the number of Euler integration steps during inference counter-intuitively and universally degrades policy performance. We attribute this to (i) additional, uniformly spaced integration steps oversample the late-time region, thereby constraining actions towards the training trajectories and reducing generalisation; and (ii) the learned velocity field becoming non-Lipschitz as integration time approaches 1, causing instability. To address these issues, we propose a novel policy that utilises non-uniform time scheduling (e.g., U-shaped) during training, which emphasises both early and late temporal stages to regularise policy training, and a dense-jump integration schedule at inference, which uses a single-step integration to replace the multi-step integration beyond a jump point, to avoid unstable areas around 1. Essentially, our policy is an efficient one-step learner that still pushes forward performance through multi-step integration, yielding up to 23.7% performance gains over state-of-the-art baselines across diverse robotic tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024FlowPolicy: Enabling Fast and Robust 3D Flow-based Policy via Consistency Flow Matching for Robot Manipulation6 Dec
  2. 2024Affordance-based Robot Manipulation with Flow Matching2 Sep
  3. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion7 Mar

Other references · 12

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  2. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  3. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
  4. 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
  5. 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,568
  6. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 715
  7. 2024AdaFlow: Imitation Learning with Variance-Adaptive Flow-Based Policiescited by 50
  8. 2025On the Closed-Form of Flow Matching: Generalization Does Not Arise from Target Stochasticitycited by 50
  9. 2024Flow Matching Imitation Learning for Multi-Support Manipulationcited by 29
  10. 2016CIFAR-10: KNN-based Ensemble of Classifierscited by 16
  11. 2024Robot Shape and Location Retention in Video Generation Using Diffusion Modelscited by 3
  12. 2025UGOD: Uncertainty-Guided Differentiable Opacity and Soft Dropout for Enhanced Sparse-View 3DGScited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Generative Control as Optimization: Time Unconditional Flow Matching for Adaptive and Robust Robotic Control
  2. 2026HybridFlow: A 2-NFE Generative Policy for Real-Time Robotic Manipulation
  3. 2026VGFM: Expressive Robot Policies via Dense Value Guidance in Flow Matching
  4. 2026Looking Back to Move Forward: Temporal Verification for Generative Robot Policies
  5. 2026FlowDPG: Deterministic Policy Gradient on Flow Matching Policies for Real-World Manipulation
  6. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies
  7. 2026Flow Policy Gradients for Robot Control
  8. 2025Generative Predictive Control: Flow Matching Policies for Dynamic and Difficult-to-Demonstrate Tasks