mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Looking Back to Move Forward: Temporal Verification for Generative Robot Policies

arXiv 2609.39038 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Language-conditioned policies and VLAs also fits: Robot manipulation imitation learning

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative policies have emerged as a promising paradigm for robot learning, combining expressive generative action modeling with scalable imitation learning from large demonstration corpora. However, heterogeneous demonstrations can induce suboptimal action chunks whose errors compound over time, eventually driving the robot into out-of-distribution states from which recovery is difficult. Action verification offers a test-time scaling strategy for mitigating this failure mode by sampling multiple candidate actions and using a verifier to select one for execution. Existing approaches, however, remain temporally myopic and costly to train, evaluating candidates from the current observation alone without accounting for trajectory continuity and often relying on large verifiers and additional expert demonstrations. In this paper, we introduce Temporal Verification (TeV), an efficient temporally aware action verification framework for flow-matching VLAs. TeV first learns a temporal token that summarizes recent observation--action history, enabling candidate chunks to be evaluated as continuations of the execution trajectory rather than as isolated predictions. Conditioned on this token, TeV constructs positive--negative pairs without additional expert demonstrations or preference annotations and trains an energy-based verifier contrastively to assign lower energy to higher-quality, trajectory-consistent action chunks. Beyond post-hoc ranking, TeV further uses the learned energy landscape to guide intermediate flow samples toward lower-energy regions, improving candidates before final selection. Extensive experiments in simulation and real-world settings demonstrate that TeV provides reliably ranks action candidates, improves task success rates, and produces smoother execution trajectories.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Language-conditioned policies and VLAs, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Temporal Policy: History-Initialized Action Generation for Robotic Learning from Demonstration
  2. 2026Generative Control as Optimization: Time Unconditional Flow Matching for Adaptive and Robust Robotic Control
  3. 2025Dense-Jump Flow Matching with Non-Uniform Time Scheduling for Robotic Policies: Mitigating Multi-Step Inference Degradation
  4. 2025EVE: A Generator-Verifier System for Generative Policies
  5. 2025Action Flow Matching for Continual Robot Learning
  6. 2025Generative Predictive Control: Flow Matching Policies for Dynamic and Difficult-to-Demonstrate Tasks
  7. 2026Visual Verification Enables Inference-time Steering and Autonomous Policy Improvement
  8. 2026Scaling Verification Can Be More Effective than Scaling Policy Learning for Vision-Language-Action Alignment