GTA: Supervised-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Text Classification with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In natural language processing tasks, pure reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning methods often suffer from inefficient exploration and slow convergence; while supervised fine-tuning (SFT) methods, although efficient in training, have limited performance ceiling and less solid theoretical foundation compared to RL. To address efficiency-capability trade-off, we propose the Guess-Think-Answer (GTA) framework that combines the efficiency of SFT with the capability gains of RL in a unified training paradigm. GTA works by having the model first produce a provisional guess (optimized via cross-entropy loss), then reflect on this guess before generating the final answer, with RL rewards shaping both the final output and the format of the entire GTA structure. This hybrid approach achieves both faster convergence than pure RL and higher performance ceiling than pure SFT. To mitigate gradient conflicts between the two training signals, we employ loss masking and gradient constraints. Empirical results on four text classification benchmarks demonstrate that GTA substantially accelerates convergence while outperforming both standalone SFT and RL baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.
Builds on
16 of 28 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
- 2024Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Surveycited by 205
- 2022MASSIVE: A 1M-Example Multilingual Natural Language Understanding Dataset with 51 Typologically-Diverse Languagescited by 146
- 2024Reinforcement Learning Enhanced LLMs: A Surveycited by 71
- 2024Beyond Chain-of-Thought: A Survey of Chain-of-X Paradigms for LLMscited by 48
4 more
- 2014Effective Use of Word Order for Text Categorization with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2024ARES: Alternating Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning for Enhanced Multi-Modal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Through Diverse AI Feedbackcited by 13
- 2025Large Language Models For Text Classification: Case Study And Comprehensive Reviewcited by 12
- 2024DISCERN: Decoding Systematic Errors in Natural Language for Text Classifierscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
- 2026HARGO: Heterogeneity-Aware Reward-Guided Optimization for RL Post-Training of LLMs on HPC Tasks
- 2025Text2Grad: Reinforcement Learning from Natural Language Feedback
- 2026ClaHF: A Human Feedback-inspired Reinforcement Learning Framework for Improving Classification Tasks
- 2026Structured Prompt Optimization Meets Reinforcement Learning for Global and Local Interpretability over Complex Text
- 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization
- 2026Reinforcement Learning from Meta-Evaluation: Aligning Language Models Without Ground-Truth Labels
- 2025Scaling Reinforcement Learning for Content Moderation with Large Language Models