mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RAPTOR: A Foundation Policy for Quadrotor Control

arXiv 2509.11481 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans are remarkably data-efficient when adapting to new unseen conditions, like driving a new car. In contrast, modern robotic control systems, like neural network policies trained using Reinforcement Learning (RL), are highly specialized for single environments. Because of this overfitting, they are known to break down even under small differences like the Simulation-to-Reality (Sim2Real) gap and require system identification and retraining for even minimal changes to the system. In this work, we present RAPTOR, a method for training a highly adaptive foundation policy for quadrotor control. Our method enables training a single, end-to-end neural-network policy to control a wide variety of quadrotors. We test 10 different real quadrotors from 32 g to 2.4 kg that also differ in motor type (brushed vs. brushless), frame type (soft vs. rigid), propeller type (2/3/4-blade), and flight controller (PX4/Betaflight/Crazyflie/M5StampFly). We find that a tiny, three-layer policy with only 2084 parameters is sufficient for zero-shot adaptation to a wide variety of platforms. The adaptation through in-context learning is made possible by using a recurrence in the hidden layer. The policy is trained through our proposed Meta-Imitation Learning algorithm, where we sample 1000 quadrotors and train a teacher policy for each of them using RL. Subsequently, the 1000 teachers are distilled into a single, adaptive student policy. We find that within milliseconds, the resulting foundation policy adapts zero-shot to unseen quadrotors. We extensively test the capabilities of the foundation policy under numerous conditions (trajectory tracking, indoor/outdoor, wind disturbance, poking, different propellers).

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.

Builds on

45 of 72 references.

References · 45

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  8. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  9. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  10. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  11. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
  12. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
33 more
  1. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  2. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  3. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 754
  4. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
  5. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 672
  6. 2020Learning Quadrupedal Locomotion over Challenging Terraincited by 604
  7. 2021RMA: Rapid Motor Adaptation for Legged Robotscited by 508
  8. 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
  9. 2019Learning by Cheatingcited by 383
  10. 2016Learning to reinforcement learncited by 377
  11. 2017Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximationcited by 121
  12. 2023Reaching the Limit in Autonomous Racing: Optimal Control versus Reinforcement Learningcited by 111
  13. 2016Learning values across many orders of magnitudecited by 85
  14. 2019Deep Drone Racing: From Simulation to Reality with Domain Randomizationcited by 76
  15. 2022A Benchmark Comparison of Learned Control Policies for Agile Quadrotor Flightcited by 47
  16. 2019Sim-to-(Multi)-Real: Transfer of Low-Level Robust Control Policies to Multiple Quadrotorscited by 45
  17. 2023Autonomous Drone Racing: A Surveycited by 35
  18. 2023Learning to Fly in Secondscited by 31
  19. 2024Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning for Quadrotorscited by 20
  20. 2024Learning Quadrotor Control From Visual Features Using Differentiable Simulationcited by 19
  21. 2023End-to-end Reinforcement Learning for Time-Optimal Quadcopter Flightcited by 17
  22. 2024A Learning-based Quadcopter Controller with Extreme Adaptationcited by 17
  23. 2019Let's Play Again: Variability of Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents in Atari Environmentscited by 11
  24. 2023End-to-end Neural Network Based Quadcopter controlcited by 11
  25. 2020The MRS UAV System: Pushing the Frontiers of Reproducible Research, Real-world Deployment, and Education with Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehiclescited by 10
  26. 2025One Net to Rule Them All: Domain Randomization in Quadcopter Racing Across Different Platformscited by 7
  27. 2022Human-Aware Physical Human-Robot Collaborative Transportation and Manipulation with Multiple Aerial Robotscited by 6
  28. 2025Leveling the Playing Field: Carefully Comparing Classical and Learned Controllers for Quadrotor Trajectory Trackingcited by 6
  29. 2024Data-Driven System Identification of Quadrotors Subject to Motor Delayscited by 5
  30. 2022Using Simulation Optimization to Improve Zero-shot Policy Transfer of Quadrotorscited by 4
  31. 2024ProxFly: Robust Control for Close Proximity Quadcopter Flight via Residual Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  32. 2019How Much Do Unstated Problem Constraints Limit Deep Robotic Reinforcement Learning?cited by 3
  33. 2025A Neural Network Mode for PX4 on Embedded Flight Controllerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Dynamics-Invariant Quadrotor Control using Scale-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Bootstrapping Reinforcement Learning with Imitation for Vision-Based Agile Flight
  3. 2025Reactive Aerobatic Flight via Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024The Power of Input: Benchmarking Zero-Shot Sim-To-Real Transfer of Reinforcement Learning Control Policies for Quadrotor Control
  5. 2026VisFly-Lab: Unified Differentiable Framework for First-Order Reinforcement Learning of Quadrotor Control
  6. 2025Towards Task-Oriented Flying: Framework, Infrastructure, and Principles
  7. 2019Flying through a narrow gap using neural network: an end-to-end planning and control approach
  8. 2026Discrete Action Space as a Prerequisite for GRPO Convergence in Small-Model Continuous Control