mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VL Norm: Rethink Loss Aggregation in RLVR

arXiv 2509.07558 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose VL Norm (Variance-reduced Length-dependent Normalization), a simple yet effective loss aggregation method tailored to the characteristic of dynamic generation lengths in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). Recently, RLVR has demonstrated strong potential in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but a major challenge lies in the large variability of response lengths during training, which leads to high gradient variance and unstable optimization. Although previous methods such as GRPO, DAPO, and Dr. GRPO introduce different loss normalization terms to address this issue, they either produce biased estimates or still suffer from high gradient variance. By analyzing the effect of varying lengths on policy loss both theoretically and empirically, we reformulate the problem as finding a minimum-variance unbiased estimator. Our proposed VL Norm not only provides an unbiased estimate of the true policy loss but also minimizes gradient variance in theory. Besides, VL Norm is easy to implement with less than 10 lines of code change. Extensive experiments show that it consistently achieves superior results across different model sizes, maximum lengths, and tasks. When integrated into the state-of-the-art RL algorithm DAPO, it achieves up to 2.67x faster convergence on the CountDown task. Our code is public at https://github.com/zerolllin/Delta-L-Normalization.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.

Builds on

16 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025rStar2-Agent: Agentic Reasoning Technical Report28 Aug
  2. 2025UloRL:An Ultra-Long Output Reinforcement Learning Approach for Advancing Large Language Models' Reasoning Abilities26 Jul
  3. 2025Stable Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Reasoning23 May
  4. 2025GRPO-LEAD: A Difficulty-Aware Reinforcement Learning Approach for Concise Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models13 Apr
  5. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model31 Mar
  6. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
  7. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  8. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  9. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs22 Jan

Other references · 7

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  3. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  4. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  6. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
  7. 2025Shorten After You're Right: Lazy Length Penalties for Reasoning RLcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Shrinking the Variance: Shrinkage Baselines for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  2. 2026Length-Unbiased Sequence Policy Optimization: Revealing and Controlling Response Length Variation in RLVR
  3. 2025Variance-Aware Baselines and Adaptive Learning Rates for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  4. 2026Linear Dynamics in the RLVR Training of Large Language Models
  5. 2026Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  6. 2026How to Allocate, How to Learn? Dynamic Rollout Allocation and Advantage Modulation for Policy Optimization
  7. 2026You Only Need Minimal RLVR Training: Extrapolating LLMs via Rank-1 Trajectories
  8. 2026Verifier-Free RL for LLMs via Intrinsic Gradient-Norm Reward