Verifier-Free RL for LLMs via Intrinsic Gradient-Norm Reward
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently emerged as a promising post-training paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs), its dependency on the gold label or domain-specific verifiers limits its scalability to new tasks and domains. In this work, we propose Verifier-free Intrinsic Gradient-Norm Reward (VIGOR), a simple reward that uses only the policy model itself. Given a prompt, VIGOR samples a group of completions and assigns higher within-group rewards to outputs that induce smaller ℓ2 norms of the teacher-forced negative log-likelihood gradients under the current parameters. Intuitively, lower gradient norms suggest the completion aligns better with the current policy, serving as an intrinsic preference signal for policy optimization. To make this intrinsic signal practical for RL, we correct the systematic length bias of averaged token-level gradients with a √T scaling, and apply group-wise rank shaping to stabilize reward scales across prompts. Across mathematical reasoning benchmarks, VIGOR outperforms the state-of-the-art Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback (RLIF) baseline, and it also exhibits cross-domain transfer to code benchmarks when trained only on math data. For instance, on Qwen2.5-7B-Base post-trained on MATH, VIGOR improves the average math accuracy by +3.31% and the average code accuracy by +1.91% over this baseline, while exhibiting more stable training dynamics. The code is available at https://github.com/ZJUSCL/VIGOR.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
12 of 29 references.
References · 12
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2024CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Executioncited by 300
- 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoningcited by 166
- 2025Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning Incentivizationcited by 128
- 2025MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model -- From Pretraining to Posttrainingcited by 121
- 2025Can Large Reasoning Models Self-Train?cited by 68
- 2025Step-KTO: Optimizing Mathematical Reasoning through Stepwise Binary Feedbackcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers
- 2025NOVER: Incentive Training for Language Models via Verifier-Free Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Extending RLVR to Open-Ended Tasks via Verifiable Multiple-Choice Reformulation
- 2025Variance-Aware Baselines and Adaptive Learning Rates for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
- 2026VI-CuRL: Stabilizing Verifier-Independent RL Reasoning via Confidence-Guided Variance Reduction
- 2025ICPO: Intrinsic Confidence-Driven Group Relative Preference Optimization for Efficient Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Gradient Regularization Mitigates Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback and Verifiable Rewards