Variance-Aware Baselines and Adaptive Learning Rates for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an effective paradigm for post-training large language models, yet the design of its baselines and learning-rate schedules remains largely heuristic. This limits our understanding of the statistical properties of policy-gradient estimators and their interaction with optimization dynamics. In this work, we develop a theoretical framework for variance-aware baseline design and adaptive learning-rate selection in RLVR. Under a KL-regularized policy-optimization setting, we establish the unbiasedness of the resulting gradient estimator, derive exact variance expressions including the KL cross-covariance, and obtain an optimization-loss upper bound that enables principled reasoning about learning dynamics. Building on these results, we prove convergence guarantees and derive an adaptive learning-rate schedule governed by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the policy gradient. We further show that the variance-optimal baseline is a gradient-weighted estimator of the KL-regularized reward, providing a principled alternative to commonly used reward-based baselines. These results lead to two complementary improvements: a variance-optimal baseline and an SNR-adaptive learning-rate rule. Experiments on Qwen3-4B-Base show that each component independently improves policy-optimization performance. The learning-rate rule can also be naturally integrated with existing policy optimization methods to yield further gains, while combining it with the variance-optimal baseline gives the full Optimal Baseline and Learning-Rate Policy Optimization (OBLR-PO) method and achieves the strongest overall performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 29 references.
References · 18
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2025DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoningcited by 261
- 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
6 more
- 2025Pass@K Policy Optimization: Solving Harder Reinforcement Learning Problemscited by 83
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignmentcited by 48
- 2025Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Reasoners via Gradient Variance Minimization in Rejection Sampling and RLcited by 23
- 2025Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regressioncited by 23
- 2025Solving Inequality Proofs with Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2025Staying in the Sweet Spot: Responsive Reasoning Evolution via Capability-Adaptive Hint Scaffoldingcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.