mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

XBusNet: Text-Guided Breast Ultrasound Segmentation via Multimodal Vision-Language Learning

arXiv 2509.07213 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Precise breast ultrasound (BUS) segmentation supports reliable measurement, quantitative analysis, and downstream classification, yet remains difficult for small or low-contrast lesions with fuzzy margins and speckle noise. Text prompts can add clinical context, but directly applying weakly localized text-image cues (e.g., CAM/CLIP-derived signals) tends to produce coarse, blob-like responses that smear boundaries unless additional mechanisms recover fine edges. Methods: We propose XBusNet, a novel dual-prompt, dual-branch multimodal model that combines image features with clinically grounded text. A global pathway based on a CLIP Vision Transformer encodes whole-image semantics conditioned on lesion size and location, while a local U-Net pathway emphasizes precise boundaries and is modulated by prompts that describe shape, margin, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) terms. Prompts are assembled automatically from structured metadata, requiring no manual clicks. We evaluate on the Breast Lesions USG (BLU) dataset using five-fold cross-validation. Primary metrics are Dice and Intersection over Union (IoU); we also conduct size-stratified analyses and ablations to assess the roles of the global and local paths and the text-driven modulation. Results: XBusNet achieves state-of-the-art performance on BLU, with mean Dice of 0.8765 and IoU of 0.8149, outperforming six strong baselines. Small lesions show the largest gains, with fewer missed regions and fewer spurious activations. Ablation studies show complementary contributions of global context, local boundary modeling, and prompt-based modulation. Conclusions: A dual-prompt, dual-branch multimodal design that merges global semantics with local precision yields accurate BUS segmentation masks and improves robustness for small, low-contrast lesions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.

Builds on

32 of 54 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  9. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  10. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,558
  11. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,525
  12. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
20 more
  1. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  2. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
  3. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  4. 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 929
  5. 2021Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Promptscited by 512
  6. 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 352
  7. 2023Customized Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 280
  8. 2019Topology-Preserving Deep Image Segmentationcited by 198
  9. 2018Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentationcited by 190
  10. 2024U-KAN Makes Strong Backbone for Medical Image Segmentation and Generationcited by 179
  11. 2019Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 116
  12. 2017Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNN): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentationcited by 109
  13. 2018BUSIS: A Benchmark for Breast Ultrasound Image Segmentationcited by 32
  14. 2020High-level Prior-based Loss Functions for Medical Image Segmentation: A Surveycited by 28
  15. 2025CausalCLIPSeg: Unlocking CLIP's Potential in Referring Medical Image Segmentation with Causal Interventioncited by 15
  16. 2020ESTAN: Enhanced Small Tumor-Aware Network for Breast Ultrasound Image Segmentationcited by 11
  17. 2020Stan: Small tumor-aware network for breast ultrasound image segmentationcited by 9
  18. 2023Attention Mechanisms in Medical Image Segmentation: A Surveycited by 9
  19. 2023Breast Ultrasound Tumor Classification Using a Hybrid Multitask CNN-Transformer Networkcited by 4
  20. 2024Ultrasound SAM Adapter: Adapting SAM for Breast Lesion Segmentation in Ultrasound Imagescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.