Large Language Models as Virtual Survey Respondents: Evaluating Sociodemographic Response Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Questionnaire-based surveys are foundational to social science research and public policymaking, yet traditional survey methods remain costly, time-consuming, and often limited in scale. Although prior work has explored large language models (LLMs) as virtual survey respondents, existing studies often address narrow task settings, focus on single sociological domains, or lack a unified evaluation framework that enables systematic comparison across diverse datasets and models. To address these gaps, we introduce two complementary task abstractions: Partial Attribute Simulation (PAS), where LLMs predict missing attributes from incomplete respondent profiles, and Full Attribute Simulation (FAS), where LLMs generate complete synthetic datasets under zero-context and context-enhanced conditions. Both are framed as diagnostic and exploratory tools rather than replacements for human data collection. We curate LLM-S^3 (Large Language Model-based Sociodemographic Survey Simulation), a benchmark spanning 11 real-world public datasets across four sociological domains, and evaluate GPT-3.5/4 Turbo and LLaMA 3.0/3.1-8B under zero-shot and few-shot settings. Our evaluation reveals consistent performance trends across model families, highlights failure modes in structured output generation, and demonstrates how context and prompt design affect simulation fidelity. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/dart-lab-research/LLM-S-Cube-Benchmark
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.
Builds on
29 of 42 references.
References · 29
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
- 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 428
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
- 2023InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviewscited by 177
17 more
- 2025The Danger of Overthinking: Examining the Reasoning-Action Dilemma in Agentic Taskscited by 150
- 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Methodcited by 97
- 2024From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agentscited by 76
- 2023Do LLMs Possess a Personality? Making the MBTI Test an Amazing Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 54
- 2023Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBenchcited by 54
- 2025Specializing Large Language Models to Simulate Survey Response Distributions for Global Populationscited by 50
- 2024Random Silicon Sampling: Simulating Human Sub-Population Opinion Using a Large Language Model Based on Group-Level Demographic Informationcited by 48
- 2023AI-Augmented Surveys: Leveraging Large Language Models and Surveys for Opinion Predictioncited by 46
- 2024How Well Can LLMs Echo Us? Evaluating AI Chatbots' Role-Play Ability with ECHOcited by 19
- 2021Few-Shot Learning with Class Imbalancecited by 18
- 2024Human Simulacra: Benchmarking the Personification of Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2024Quantifying and Optimizing Global Faithfulness in Persona-driven Role-playingcited by 17
- 2024Are Large Language Models (LLMs) Good Social Predictors?cited by 13
- 2024Large Language Models as Instruments of Power: New Regimes of Autonomous Manipulation and Controlcited by 10
- 2024ReFF: Reinforcing Format Faithfulness in Language Models across Varied Taskscited by 9
- 2025On the Generalization vs Fidelity Paradox in Knowledge Distillationcited by 7
- 2024PersonalityChat: Conversation Distillation for Personalized Dialog Modeling with Facts and Traitscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026In-Context Learning for the Imputation of Public Opinion Data with Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026From Demographics to Survey Anchors: Evaluating LLM Agents for Modeling Retirement Attitudescited by 0
- 2026Using Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Survey Data for Geographically Explicit Population Synthesiscited by 0
- 2026Generating Public Health Responses using Survey-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026From Process Loss to Assembly Bonus: Human-Grounded Diagnosis of Multi-Agent LLM Collaborationcited by 0
- 2026Large Language Models Substantially Compress Well-Being Inequality but Largely Preserve Its Socioeconomic Structurecited by 0
- 2026Simulating Respondents, Not Single Questions: Coherent Survey Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Simulating Respondents, Not Single Questions: Coherent Survey Generation with Large Language Models28 Sep 2026
- 2026Large Language Models Substantially Compress Well-Being Inequality but Largely Preserve Its Socioeconomic Structure27 Sep 2026
- 2026From Process Loss to Assembly Bonus: Human-Grounded Diagnosis of Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration6 Sep 2026
- 2026Generating Public Health Responses using Survey-Augmented Large Language Models20 Jun 2026
- 2026In-Context Learning for the Imputation of Public Opinion Data with Large Language Models8 Jun 2026
- 2026From Demographics to Survey Anchors: Evaluating LLM Agents for Modeling Retirement Attitudes24 Apr 2026
- 2026Using Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Survey Data for Geographically Explicit Population Synthesis23 Apr 2026