mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ReFF: Reinforcing Format Faithfulness in Language Models across Varied Tasks

arXiv 2412.09173 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2024cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Following formatting instructions to generate well-structured content is a fundamental yet often unmet capability for large language models (LLMs). To study this capability, which we refer to as format faithfulness, we present FormatBench, a comprehensive format-related benchmark. Compared to previous format-related benchmarks, FormatBench involves a greater variety of tasks in terms of application scenes (traditional NLP tasks, creative works, autonomous agency tasks), human-LLM interaction styles (single-turn instruction, multi-turn chat), and format types (inclusion, wrapping, length, coding). Moreover, each task in FormatBench is attached with a format checker program. Extensive experiments on the benchmark reveal that state-of-the-art open- and closed-source LLMs still suffer from severe deficiency in format faithfulness. By virtue of the decidable nature of formats, we propose to Reinforce Format Faithfulness (ReFF) to help LLMs generate formatted output as instructed without compromising general quality. Without any annotated data, ReFF can substantially improve the format faithfulness rate (e.g., from 21.6% in original LLaMA3 to 95.0% on caption segmentation task), while keep the general quality comparable (e.g., from 47.3 to 46.4 in F1 scores). Combined with labeled training data, ReFF can simultaneously improve both format faithfulness (e.g., from 21.6% in original LLaMA3 to 75.5%) and general quality (e.g., from 47.3 to 61.6 in F1 scores). We further offer an interpretability analysis to explain how ReFF improves both format faithfulness and general quality.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2024.

Builds on

13 of 37 references.

References · 13

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  7. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  8. 2022Holistic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 115
  9. 2024FOFO: A Benchmark to Evaluate LLMs' Format-Following Capabilitycited by 79
  10. 2020Exploring Controllable Text Generation Techniquescited by 55
  11. 2023Errors are Useful Prompts: Instruction Guided Task Programming with Verifier-Assisted Iterative Promptingcited by 45
  12. 2023Struc-Bench: Are Large Language Models Really Good at Generating Complex Structured Data?cited by 16
1 more
  1. 2020Acrostic Poem Generationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

9 papers.