AI Agents for Web Testing: A Case Study in the Wild
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated web testing plays a critical role in ensuring high-quality user experiences and delivering business value. Traditional approaches primarily focus on code coverage and load testing, but often fall short of capturing complex user behaviors, leaving many usability issues undetected. The emergence of large language models (LLM) and AI agents opens new possibilities for web testing by enabling human-like interaction with websites and a general awareness of common usability problems. In this work, we present WebProber, a prototype AI agent-based web testing framework. Given a URL, WebProber autonomously explores the website, simulating real user interactions, identifying bugs and usability issues, and producing a human-readable report. We evaluate WebProber through a case study of 120 academic personal websites, where it uncovered 29 usability issues--many of which were missed by traditional tools. Our findings highlight agent-based testing as a promising direction while outlining directions for developing next-generation, user-centered testing frameworks.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.
Builds on
21 of 34 references.
References · 21
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2023Set-of-Mark Prompting Unleashes Extraordinary Visual Grounding in GPT-4Vcited by 299
- 2024An Introduction to Vision-Language Modelingcited by 178
- 2024Tree Search for Language Model Agentscited by 151
- 2024ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learningcited by 62
- 2023Prompt-Based Monte-Carlo Tree Search for Goal-Oriented Dialogue Policy Planningcited by 61
- 2023Explore, Select, Derive, and Recall: Augmenting LLM with Human-like Memory for Mobile Task Automationcited by 58
- 2023Make LLM a Testing Expert: Bringing Human-like Interaction to Mobile GUI Testing via Functionality-aware Decisionscited by 41
- 2025UXAgent: An LLM Agent-Based Usability Testing Framework for Web Designcited by 40
- 2022Fill in the Blank: Context-aware Automated Text Input Generation for Mobile GUI Testingcited by 36
- 2024AutoDroid-V2: Boosting SLM-based GUI Agents via Code Generationcited by 34
9 more
- 2021Automatic Web Testing using Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2023Autonomous Large Language Model Agents Enabling Intent-Driven Mobile GUI Testingcited by 15
- 2023Testing the Limits: Unusual Text Inputs Generation for Mobile App Crash Detection with Large Language Modelcited by 10
- 2024NaviQAte: Functionality-Guided Web Application Navigationcited by 9
- 2025ResTest: Targeted Coverage of Residual Not-Covered Code Using Large Language Models for Web GUI Testingcited by 7
- 2024Feature-Driven End-To-End Test Generationcited by 6
- 2024Leveraging Large Vision Language Model For Better Automatic Web GUI Testingcited by 5
- 2025Automated Web Application Testing: End-to-End Test Case Generation with Large Language Models and Screen Transition Graphscited by 2
- 2023Neural Embeddings for Web Testingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026WebTestBench: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents towards End-to-End Automated Web Testingcited by 4
- 2026DiagEval: Trajectory-Conditioned Diagnosis for Reliable Software Evaluation with GUI Agentscited by 2
- 2026WebRISE: Requirement-Induced State Evaluation for MLLM-Generated Web Artifactscited by 2
- 2026PerceptUI: LLM Agents as Human-Aligned Synthetic Users for UI/UX Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026Framework and Benchmark for Code-Driven Agentic Testing in Web Developmentcited by 0
- 2026Automatic multimodal UX improvement recommendations from LLM agent user simulationscited by 0
- 2026Automatic multimodal UX improvement recommendations from LLM agent user simulations19 Sep 2026
- 2026Framework and Benchmark for Code-Driven Agentic Testing in Web Development31 Aug 2026
- 2026PerceptUI: LLM Agents as Human-Aligned Synthetic Users for UI/UX Evaluation4 Jun 2026
- 2026WebRISE: Requirement-Induced State Evaluation for MLLM-Generated Web Artifacts2 Jun 2026
- 2026DiagEval: Trajectory-Conditioned Diagnosis for Reliable Software Evaluation with GUI Agents17 May 2026
- 2026WebTestBench: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents towards End-to-End Automated Web Testing26 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AgentA/B: Automated and Scalable Web A/BTesting with Interactive LLM Agents
- 2024WebSuite: Systematically Evaluating Why Web Agents Fail
- 2025An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents
- 2025Build the web for agents, not agents for the web
- 2024Beyond Browsing: API-Based Web Agents
- 2026VibeJam: A User Study Platform for Web Development with Agents
- 2026A Baseline Assessment for the Agentic Web Technology Stack
- 2025Automatically Generating Web Applications from Requirements Via Multi-Agent Test-Driven Development