ALSA: Anchors in Logit Space for Out-of-Distribution Accuracy Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating model accuracy on unseen, unlabeled datasets is crucial for real-world machine learning applications, especially under distribution shifts that can degrade performance. Existing methods often rely on predicted class probabilities (softmax scores) or data similarity metrics. While softmax-based approaches benefit from representing predictions on the standard simplex, compressing logits into probabilities leads to information loss. Meanwhile, similarity-based methods can be computationally expensive and domain-specific, limiting their broader applicability. In this paper, we introduce ALSA (Anchors in Logit Space for Accuracy estimation), a novel framework that preserves richer information by operating directly in the logit space. Building on theoretical insights and empirical observations, we demonstrate that the aggregation and distribution of logits exhibit a strong correlation with the predictive performance of the model. To exploit this property, ALSA employs an anchor-based modeling strategy: multiple learnable anchors are initialized in logit space, each assigned an influence function that captures subtle variations in the logits. This allows ALSA to provide robust and accurate performance estimates across a wide range of distribution shifts. Extensive experiments on vision, language, and graph benchmarks demonstrate ALSA's superiority over both softmax- and similarity-based baselines. Notably, ALSA's robustness under significant distribution shifts highlights its potential as a practical tool for reliable model evaluation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.
Builds on
41 of 51 references.
References · 41
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
29 more
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 405
- 2020Long-Tailed Classification by Keeping the Good and Removing the Bad Momentum Causal Effectcited by 256
- 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
- 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 207
- 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 200
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 145
- 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 117
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2016Deep Structured Energy Based Models for Anomaly Detectioncited by 114
- 2020Hybrid Models for Open Set Recognitioncited by 109
- 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
- 2020A Review of Single-Source Deep Unsupervised Visual Domain Adaptationcited by 96
- 2022Agreement-on-the-Line: Predicting the Performance of Neural Networks under Distribution Shiftcited by 94
- 2021What Does Rotation Prediction Tell Us about Classifier Accuracy under Varying Testing Environments?cited by 63
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shiftcited by 55
- 2022Predicting Out-of-Distribution Error with the Projection Normcited by 50
- 2020Distributional Generalization: A New Kind of Generalizationcited by 42
- 2023Confidence and Dispersity Speak: Characterising Prediction Matrix for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimationcited by 22
- 2023Characterizing Out-of-Distribution Error via Optimal Transportcited by 20
- 2016Domain Adaptation by Mixture of Alignments of Second- or Higher-Order Scatter Tensorscited by 18
- 2021On Out-of-distribution Detection with Energy-based Modelscited by 17
- 2023GNNEvaluator: Evaluating GNN Performance On Unseen Graphs Without Labelscited by 17
- 2025GOLD: Graph Out-of-Distribution Detection via Implicit Adversarial Latent Generationcited by 15
- 2025Text Meets Topology: Rethinking Out-of-distribution Detection in Text-Rich Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.