mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rule Synergy Analysis using LLMs: State of the Art and Implications

arXiv 2508.19484 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a variety of domains, including logical reasoning, mathematics, and more. In this paper, we investigate how well LLMs understand and reason about complex rule interactions in dynamic environments, such as card games. We introduce a dataset of card synergies from the game Slay the Spire, where pairs of cards are classified based on their positive, negative, or neutral interactions. Our evaluation shows that while LLMs excel at identifying non-synergistic pairs, they struggle with detecting positive and, particularly, negative synergies. We categorize common error types, including issues with timing, defining game states, and following game rules. Our findings suggest directions for future research to improve model performance in predicting the effect of rules and their interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.

Builds on

7 of 15 references.

References · 7

  1. 2024Large Language Models and Games: A Survey and Roadmapcited by 93
  2. 2023Level Generation Through Large Language Modelscited by 68
  3. 2023MarioGPT: Open-Ended Text2Level Generation through Large Language Modelscited by 64
  4. 2023BoardgameQA: A Dataset for Natural Language Reasoning with Contradictory Informationcited by 44
  5. 2023TRAM: Benchmarking Temporal Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 40
  6. 2023Towards Benchmarking and Improving the Temporal Reasoning Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 37
  7. 2023TaskLAMA: Probing the Complex Task Understanding of Language Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluations
  2. 2026Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models. Lessons Learned from General Game Playing
  3. 2024GAMEBoT: Transparent Assessment of LLM Reasoning in Games
  4. 2026How Far Are LLMs from Professional Poker Players? Revisiting Game-Theoretic Reasoning with Agentic Tool Use
  5. 2024LogicGame: Benchmarking Rule-Based Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models
  6. 2025Baba is LLM: Reasoning in a Game with Dynamic Rules
  7. 2025Code World Models for General Game Playing
  8. 2024How Far Are We on the Decision-Making of LLMs? Evaluating LLMs' Gaming Ability in Multi-Agent Environments