mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Ramon Llull's Thinking Machine for Automated Ideation

arXiv 2508.19200 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper revisits Ramon Llull's Ars combinatoria - a medieval framework for generating knowledge through symbolic recombination - as a conceptual foundation for building a modern Llull's thinking machine for research ideation. Our approach defines three compositional axes: Theme (e.g., efficiency, adaptivity), Domain (e.g., question answering, machine translation), and Method (e.g., adversarial training, linear attention). These elements represent high-level abstractions common in scientific work - motivations, problem settings, and technical approaches - and serve as building blocks for LLM-driven exploration. We mine elements from human experts or conference papers and show that prompting LLMs with curated combinations produces research ideas that are diverse, relevant, and grounded in current literature. This modern thinking machine offers a lightweight, interpretable tool for augmenting scientific creativity and suggests a path toward collaborative ideation between humans and AI.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.

Builds on

17 of 51 references.

References · 17

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  2. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  3. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  4. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  5. 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
  6. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 155
  7. 2025MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbationscited by 89
  8. 2025NoveltyBench: Evaluating Language Models for Humanlike Diversitycited by 66
  9. 2025The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideascited by 62
  10. 2025CodeScientist: End-to-End Semi-Automated Scientific Discovery with Code-based Experimentationcited by 57
  11. 2024Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluationcited by 41
  12. 2024ResearchTown: Simulator of Human Research Communitycited by 37
5 more
  1. 2025Ai2 Scholar QA: Organized Literature Synthesis with Attributioncited by 25
  2. 2020An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Processcited by 24
  3. 2024A Reply to Makelov et al. (2023)'s "Interpretability Illusion" Argumentscited by 17
  4. 2024Taxonomy-guided Semantic Indexing for Academic Paper Searchcited by 12
  5. 2025CHIMERA: A Knowledge Base of Scientific Idea Recombinations for Research Analysis and Ideationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Large Language Models for Scientific Idea Generation: A Creativity-Centered Survey
  2. 2024Assessing the Creativity of LLMs in Proposing Novel Solutions to Mathematical Problems
  3. 2025Idea2Plan: Exploring AI-Powered Research Planning
  4. 2026Sparking Scientific Creativity via LLM-Driven Interdisciplinary Inspiration
  5. 2025Universe of Thoughts: Enabling Creative Reasoning with Large Language Models
  6. 2024Evaluating LLMs' Divergent Thinking Capabilities for Scientific Idea Generation with Minimal Context
  7. 2026LLM Jaggedness Unlocks Scientific Creativity
  8. 2026Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Tasks