mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beam Geometry and Input Dimensionality: Impact on Sparse-Sampling Artifact Correction for Clinical CT with U-Nets

arXiv 2508.17961 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2025cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study aims to investigate the effect of various beam geometries and dimensions of input data on the sparse-sampling streak artifact correction task with U-Nets for clinical CT scans as a means of incorporating the volumetric context into artifact reduction tasks to improve model performance. A total of 22 subjects were retrospectively selected (01.2016-12.2018) from the Technical University of Munich's research hospital, TUM Klinikum rechts der Isar. Sparsely-sampled CT volumes were simulated with the Astra toolbox for parallel, fan, and cone beam geometries. 2048 views were taken as full-view scans. 2D and 3D U-Nets were trained and validated on 14, and tested on 8 subjects, respectively. For the dimensionality study, in addition to the 512x512 2D CT images, the CT scans were further pre-processed to generate a so-called '2.5D', and 3D data: Each CT volume was divided into 64x64x64 voxel blocks. The 3D data refers to individual 64-voxel blocks. An axial, coronal, and sagittal cut through the center of each block resulted in three 64x64 2D patches that were rearranged as a single 64x64x3 image, proposed as 2.5D data. Model performance was assessed with the mean squared error (MSE) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). For all geometries, the 2D U-Net trained on axial 2D slices results in the best MSE and SSIM values, outperforming the 2.5D and 3D input data dimensions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.

Builds on

8 of 23 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  3. 2017Framing U-Net via Deep Convolutional Framelets: Application to Sparse-view CTcited by 88
  4. 2021Multi-view 3D Reconstruction with Transformercited by 52
  5. 20182.5D Deep Learning for CT Image Reconstruction using a Multi-GPU implementationcited by 8
  6. 2022WNet: A data-driven dual-domain denoising model for sparse-view computed tomography with a trainable reconstruction layercited by 7
  7. 2023Improving Automated Hemorrhage Detection in Sparse-view Computed Tomography via Deep Convolutional Neural Network based Artifact Reductioncited by 2
  8. 2023Improving image quality of sparse-view lung tumor CT images with U-Netcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.