Improving Automated Hemorrhage Detection in Sparse-view Computed Tomography via Deep Convolutional Neural Network based Artifact Reduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This is a preprint. The latest version has been published here: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/ryai.230275 Purpose: Sparse-view computed tomography (CT) is an effective way to reduce dose by lowering the total number of views acquired, albeit at the expense of image quality, which, in turn, can impact the ability to detect diseases. We explore deep learning-based artifact reduction in sparse-view cranial CT scans and its impact on automated hemorrhage detection. Methods: We trained a U-Net for artefact reduction on simulated sparse-view cranial CT scans from 3000 patients obtained from a public dataset and reconstructed with varying levels of sub-sampling. Additionally, we trained a convolutional neural network on fully sampled CT data from 17,545 patients for automated hemorrhage detection. We evaluated the classification performance using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC-ROCs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the DeLong test, along with confusion matrices. The performance of the U-Net was compared to an analytical approach based on total variation (TV). Results: The U-Net performed superior compared to unprocessed and TV-processed images with respect to image quality and automated hemorrhage diagnosis. With U-Net post-processing, the number of views can be reduced from 4096 (AUC-ROC: 0.974; 95% CI: 0.972-0.976) views to 512 views (0.973; 0.971-0.975) with minimal decrease in hemorrhage detection (P<.001) and to 256 views (0.967; 0.964-0.969) with a slight performance decrease (P<.001). Conclusion: The results suggest that U-Net based artifact reduction substantially enhances automated hemorrhage detection in sparse-view cranial CTs. Our findings highlight that appropriate post-processing is crucial for optimal image quality and diagnostic accuracy while minimizing radiation dose.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2023.
Builds on
9 of 41 references.
References · 9
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
- 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 431
- 2018Toward Convolutional Blind Denoising of Real Photographscited by 274
- 2017Framing U-Net via Deep Convolutional Framelets: Application to Sparse-view CTcited by 87
- 2022Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learningcited by 13
- 2022WNet: A data-driven dual-domain denoising model for sparse-view computed tomography with a trainable reconstruction layercited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.