mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Substantive Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness: Desiderata for a Feminist Approach

arXiv 2508.17944 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

People's experiences of discrimination are often shaped by multiple intersecting factors, yet algorithmic fairness research rarely reflects this complexity. While intersectionality offers tools for understanding how forms of oppression interact, current approaches to intersectional algorithmic fairness tend to focus on narrowly defined demographic subgroups. These methods contribute important insights but risk oversimplifying social reality and neglecting structural inequalities. In this paper, we outline how a substantive approach to intersectional algorithmic fairness can reorient this research and practice. In particular, we propose Substantive Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness, extending Green's (2022) notion of substantive algorithmic fairness with insights from intersectional feminist theory. Aiming to provide as actionable guidance as possible, our approach is articulated as ten desiderata to guide the design, assessment, and deployment of algorithmic systems that address systemic inequities while mitigating harms to intersectionally marginalized communities. Rather than prescribing fixed operationalizations, these desiderata invite AI practitioners and experts to reflect on assumptions of neutrality, the use of protected attributes, the inclusion of multiply marginalized groups, and the transformative potential of algorithmic systems. By bridging computational and social science perspectives, the approach emphasizes that fairness cannot be separated from social context, and that in some cases, principled non-deployment may be necessary.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 143 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.

Builds on

27 of 143 references.

References · 27

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  4. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  5. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  6. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  7. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
  8. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 194
  9. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 184
  10. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 174
  11. 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
  12. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
15 more
  1. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 127
  2. 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 125
  3. 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 101
  4. 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
  5. 2021Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisonscited by 42
  6. 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challengescited by 41
  7. 2018Probably Approximately Metric-Fair Learningcited by 29
  8. 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairnesscited by 26
  9. 2020Machine learning fairness notions: Bridging the gap with real-world applicationscited by 19
  10. 2020Against Scale: Provocations and Resistances to Scale Thinkingcited by 18
  11. 2021Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppressioncited by 12
  12. 2024From the Fair Distribution of Predictions to the Fair Distribution of Social Goods: Evaluating the Impact of Fair Machine Learning on Long-Term Unemploymentcited by 12
  13. 2024Data Feminism for AIcited by 6
  14. 2024The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 5
  15. 2021Escaping the Impossibility of Fairness: From Formal to Substantive Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.