Voice Over Body? Older Adults' Reactions to Robot and Voice Assistant Facilitators of Group Conversation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Intelligent agents have great potential as facilitators of group conversation among older adults. However, little is known about how to design agents for this purpose and user group, especially in terms of agent embodiment. To this end, we conducted a mixed methods study of older adults' reactions to voice and body in a group conversation facilitation agent. Two agent forms with the same underlying artificial intelligence (AI) and voice system were compared: a humanoid robot and a voice assistant. One preliminary study (total n=24) and one experimental study comparing voice and body morphologies (n=36) were conducted with older adults and an experienced human facilitator. Findings revealed that the artificiality of the agent, regardless of its form, was beneficial for the socially uncomfortable task of conversation facilitation. Even so, talkative personality types had a poorer experience with the "bodied" robot version. Design implications and supplementary reactions, especially to agent voice, are also discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Social Identity in Human-Agent Interaction: A Primercited by 3
- 2024Qualitative Approaches to Voice UXcited by 1
- 2025More-than-Human Storytelling: Designing Longitudinal Narrative Engagements with Generative AIcited by 1
- 2024Robotic Backchanneling in Online Conversation Facilitation: A Cross-Generational Studycited by 0
- 2025Social Identity in Human-Agent Interaction: A Primer12 Aug 2025
- 2025More-than-Human Storytelling: Designing Longitudinal Narrative Engagements with Generative AI20 May 2025
- 2024Robotic Backchanneling in Online Conversation Facilitation: A Cross-Generational Study25 Sep 2024
- 2024Qualitative Approaches to Voice UX23 Apr 2024