Exploiting Policy Idling for Dexterous Manipulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning-based methods for dexterous manipulation have made notable progress in recent years. However, learned policies often still lack reliability and exhibit limited robustness to important factors of variation. One failure pattern that can be observed across many settings is that policies idle, i.e. they cease to move beyond a small region of states when they reach certain states. This policy idling is often a reflection of the training data. For instance, it can occur when the data contains small actions in areas where the robot needs to perform high-precision motions, e.g., when preparing to grasp an object or object insertion. Prior works have tried to mitigate this phenomenon e.g. by filtering the training data or modifying the control frequency. However, these approaches can negatively impact policy performance in other ways. As an alternative, we investigate how to leverage the detectability of idling behavior to inform exploration and policy improvement. Our approach, Pause-Induced Perturbations (PIP), applies perturbations at detected idling states, thus helping it to escape problematic basins of attraction. On a range of challenging simulated dual-arm tasks, we find that this simple approach can already noticeably improve test-time performance, with no additional supervision or training. Furthermore, since the robot tends to idle at critical points in a movement, we also find that learning from the resulting episodes leads to better iterative policy improvement compared to prior approaches. Our perturbation strategy also leads to a 15-35% improvement in absolute success rate on a real-world insertion task that requires complex multi-finger manipulation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.
Builds on
37 of 48 references.
References · 37
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
- 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,568
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
- 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 671
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
- 2023IDQL: Implicit Q-Learning as an Actor-Critic Method with Diffusion Policiescited by 325
- 2018Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learningcited by 280
- 2024Diffusion Policy Policy Optimizationcited by 280
- 2018HG-DAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning with Human Expertscited by 266
- 2020First return, then explorecited by 266
25 more
- 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuningcited by 237
- 2021Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Balanced Replay and Pessimistic Q-Ensemblecited by 214
- 2017Reverse Curriculum Generation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 198
- 2017DART: Noise Injection for Robust Imitation Learningcited by 191
- 2024ALOHA Unleashed: A Simple Recipe for Robot Dexteritycited by 134
- 2021ThriftyDAgger: Budget-Aware Novelty and Risk Gating for Interactive Imitation Learningcited by 108
- 2024Steering Your Generalists: Improving Robotic Foundation Models via Value Guidancecited by 106
- 2024AutoRT: Embodied Foundation Models for Large Scale Orchestration of Robotic Agentscited by 87
- 2020Grasping with Chopsticks: Combating Covariate Shift in Model-free Imitation Learning for Fine Manipulationcited by 38
- 2024JUICER: Data-Efficient Imitation Learning for Robotic Assemblycited by 38
- 2024Offline Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning Scales to Large Modelscited by 30
- 2023CCIL: Continuity-based Data Augmentation for Corrective Imitation Learningcited by 29
- 2022Causal Imitation Learning under Temporally Correlated Noisecited by 28
- 2023Emergence of In-Context Reinforcement Learning from Noise Distillationcited by 27
- 2022The Challenges of Exploration for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2022You Only Live Once: Single-Life Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2022Back to the Manifold: Recovering from Out-of-Distribution Statescited by 20
- 2021Collect & Infer -- a fresh look at data-efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2024So You Think You Can Scale Up Autonomous Robot Data Collection?cited by 17
- 2023Mastering Stacking of Diverse Shapes with Large-Scale Iterative Reinforcement Learning on Real Robotscited by 13
- 2024DemoStart: Demonstration-led auto-curriculum applied to sim-to-real with multi-fingered robotscited by 11
- 2023Learning to Identify Critical States for Reinforcement Learning from Videoscited by 9
- 2022Bayesian Disturbance Injection: Robust Imitation Learning of Flexible Policies for Robot Manipulationcited by 8
- 2024To Err is Robotic: Rapid Value-Based Trial-and-Error during Deploymentcited by 7
- 2018The Concept of Criticality in Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.