To Err is Robotic: Rapid Value-Based Trial-and-Error during Deployment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When faced with a novel scenario, it can be hard to succeed on the first attempt. In these challenging situations, it is important to know how to retry quickly and meaningfully. Retrying behavior can emerge naturally in robots trained on diverse data, but such robot policies will typically only exhibit undirected retrying behavior and may not terminate a suboptimal approach before an unrecoverable mistake. We can improve these robot policies by instilling an explicit ability to try, evaluate, and retry a diverse range of strategies. We introduce Bellman-Guided Retrials, an algorithm that works on top of a base robot policy by monitoring the robot's progress, detecting when a change of plan is needed, and adapting the executed strategy until the robot succeeds. We start with a base policy trained on expert demonstrations of a variety of scenarios. Then, using the same expert demonstrations, we train a value function to estimate task completion. During test time, we use the value function to compare our expected rate of progress to our achieved rate of progress. If our current strategy fails to make progress at a reasonable rate, we recover the robot and sample a new strategy from the base policy while skewing it away from behaviors that have recently failed. We evaluate our method on simulated and real-world environments that contain a diverse suite of scenarios. We find that Bellman-Guided Retrials increases the average absolute success rates of base policies by more than 20% in simulation and 50% in real-world experiments, demonstrating a promising framework for instilling existing trained policies with explicit trial and error capabilities. For evaluation videos and other documentation, go to https://sites.google.com/view/to-err-robotic/home
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025DynaGuide: Steering Diffusion Polices with Active Dynamic Guidancecited by 44
- 2025CO-RFT: Efficient Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language-Action Models through Chunked Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
- 2025RobustVLA: Robustness-Aware Reinforcement Post-Training for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 18
- 2026CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 14
- 2026FAR: Failure-Aware Retry for Test-Time Recovery and Continual Policy Improvementcited by 5
- 2025Exploiting Policy Idling for Dexterous Manipulationcited by 1
- 2026Skill-Space Shooting for Autonomous Robot Policy Improvementcited by 0
- 2026Skill-Space Shooting for Autonomous Robot Policy Improvement29 Sep 2026
- 2026FAR: Failure-Aware Retry for Test-Time Recovery and Continual Policy Improvement1 Jul 2026
- 2026CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding5 Jan 2026
- 2025RobustVLA: Robustness-Aware Reinforcement Post-Training for Vision-Language-Action Models3 Nov 2025
- 2025Exploiting Policy Idling for Dexterous Manipulation21 Aug 2025
- 2025CO-RFT: Efficient Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language-Action Models through Chunked Offline Reinforcement Learning4 Aug 2025
- 2025DynaGuide: Steering Diffusion Polices with Active Dynamic Guidance16 Jun 2025