mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LFaB: Low fidelity as Bias for Active Learning in the chemical configuration space

arXiv 2508.15577 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2025physics.chem-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning promises to provide an optimal training sample selection procedure in the construction of machine learning models. It often relies on minimizing the model's variance, which is assumed to decrease the prediction error. Still, it is frequently even less efficient than pure random sampling. Motivated by the bias-variance decomposition, we propose to minimize the model's bias instead of its variance. By doing so, we are able to almost exactly match the best-case error over all possible greedy sample selection procedures for a relevant application. Our bias approximation is based on using cheap to calculate low fidelity data as known from Delta-ML or multifidelity machine learning. We exemplify our approach for a wider class of applications in quantum chemistry including predicting excitation energies and ab initio potential energy surfaces. Here, the proposed method reduces training data consumption by up to an order of magnitude compared to standard active learning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.

Builds on

15 of 74 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
  2. 2021Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectracited by 441
  3. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
  4. 2019Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Taskscited by 87
  5. 2020Machine learning for electronically excited states of moleculescited by 30
  6. 2022Fast Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Learning Interatomic Potentialscited by 22
  7. 2022Scalable Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Network Potentials: Promise and Pitfallscited by 11
  8. 2017WACSF - Weighted Atom-Centered Symmetry Functions as Descriptors in Machine Learning Potentialscited by 9
  9. 2024Multitask methods for predicting molecular properties from heterogeneous datacited by 8
  10. 2024QeMFi: A Multifidelity Dataset of Quantum Chemical Properties of Diverse Moleculescited by 7
  11. 2023Machine Learning Small Molecule Properties in Drug Discoverycited by 5
  12. 2023Multi-Fidelity Machine Learning for Excited State Energies of Moleculescited by 4
3 more
  1. 2024Assessing Non-Nested Configurations of Multifidelity Machine Learning for Quantum-Chemical Propertiescited by 4
  2. 2024Investigating Data Hierarchies in Multifidelity Machine Learning for Excitation Energiescited by 2
  3. 2024Evaluation of uncertainty estimations for Gaussian process regression based machine learning interatomic potentialscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.