QeMFi: A Multifidelity Dataset of Quantum Chemical Properties of Diverse Molecules
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Progress in both Machine Learning (ML) and Quantum Chemistry (QC) methods have resulted in high accuracy ML models for QC properties. Datasets such as MD17 and WS22 have been used to benchmark these models at some level of QC method, or fidelity, which refers to the accuracy of the chosen QC method. Multifidelity ML (MFML) methods, where models are trained on data from more than one fidelity, have shown to be effective over single fidelity methods. Much research is progressing in this direction for diverse applications ranging from energy band gaps to excitation energies. One hurdle for effective research here is the lack of a diverse multifidelity dataset for benchmarking. We provide the Quantum chemistry MultiFidelity (QeMFi) dataset consisting of five fidelities calculated with the TD-DFT formalism. The fidelities differ in their basis set choice: STO-3G, 3-21G, 6-31G, def2-SVP, and def2-TZVP. QeMFi offers to the community a variety of QC properties such as vertical excitation properties and molecular dipole moments, further including QC computation times allowing for a time benefit benchmark of multifidelity models for ML-QC.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.
Builds on
6 of 35 references.
References · 6
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
- 2020Machine learning for electronically excited states of moleculescited by 30
- 2024Multitask methods for predicting molecular properties from heterogeneous datacited by 8
- 2023Multi-Fidelity Machine Learning for Excited State Energies of Moleculescited by 4
- 2024Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physicscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Spectral/Spatial Tensor Atomic Cluster Expansion with Universal Embeddings in Cartesian Spacecited by 5
- 2024Assessing Non-Nested Configurations of Multifidelity Machine Learning for Quantum-Chemical Propertiescited by 4
- 2024Investigating Data Hierarchies in Multifidelity Machine Learning for Excitation Energiescited by 2
- 2025LFaB: Low fidelity as Bias for Active Learning in the chemical configuration spacecited by 2
- 2026Improvise, Adapt, Overcome: An On-The-Fly Multifidelity Algorithm for Efficient Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2024Benchmarking Data Efficiency in Delta-ML and Multifidelity Models for Quantum Chemistrycited by 0
- 2026Multivariate conformal uncertainty propagation in multitask atomistic simulation: Successes and pitfallscited by 0
- 2026Multivariate conformal uncertainty propagation in multitask atomistic simulation: Successes and pitfalls25 Sep 2026
- 2026Improvise, Adapt, Overcome: An On-The-Fly Multifidelity Algorithm for Efficient Machine Learning1 Jun 2026
- 2025Spectral/Spatial Tensor Atomic Cluster Expansion with Universal Embeddings in Cartesian Space18 Sep 2025
- 2025LFaB: Low fidelity as Bias for Active Learning in the chemical configuration space21 Aug 2025
- 2024Investigating Data Hierarchies in Multifidelity Machine Learning for Excitation Energies15 Oct 2024
- 2024Benchmarking Data Efficiency in Delta-ML and Multifidelity Models for Quantum Chemistry15 Oct 2024
- 2024Assessing Non-Nested Configurations of Multifidelity Machine Learning for Quantum-Chemical Properties24 Jul 2024