Assessing Non-Nested Configurations of Multifidelity Machine Learning for Quantum-Chemical Properties
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multifidelity machine learning (MFML) for quantum chemical (QC) properties has seen strong development in the recent years. The method has been shown to reduce the cost of generating training data for high-accuracy low-cost ML models. In such a set-up, the ML models are trained on molecular geometries and some property of interest computed at various computational chemistry accuracies, or fidelities. These are then combined in training the MFML models. In some multifidelity models, the training data is required to be nested, that is the same molecular geometries are included to calculate the property across all the fidelities. In these multifidelity models, the requirement of a nested configuration restricts the kind of sampling that can be performed while selection training samples at different fidelities. This work assesses the use of non-nested training data for two of these multifidelity methods, namely MFML and optimized MFML (o-MFML). The assessment is carried out for the prediction of ground state energies and first vertical excitation energies of a diverse collection of molecules of the CheMFi dataset. Results indicate that the MFML method still requires a nested structure of training data across the fidelities. However, the o-MFML method shows promising results for non-nested multifidelity training data with model errors comparable to the nested configurations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.
Builds on
4 of 32 references.
References · 4
- 2020Machine learning for electronically excited states of moleculescited by 30
- 2024Multitask methods for predicting molecular properties from heterogeneous datacited by 8
- 2024QeMFi: A Multifidelity Dataset of Quantum Chemical Properties of Diverse Moleculescited by 7
- 2024Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physicscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Investigating Data Hierarchies in Multifidelity Machine Learning for Excitation Energiescited by 2
- 2025LFaB: Low fidelity as Bias for Active Learning in the chemical configuration spacecited by 2
- 2026Improvise, Adapt, Overcome: An On-The-Fly Multifidelity Algorithm for Efficient Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2024Benchmarking Data Efficiency in Delta-ML and Multifidelity Models for Quantum Chemistrycited by 0
- 2026Improvise, Adapt, Overcome: An On-The-Fly Multifidelity Algorithm for Efficient Machine Learning1 Jun 2026
- 2025LFaB: Low fidelity as Bias for Active Learning in the chemical configuration space21 Aug 2025
- 2024Investigating Data Hierarchies in Multifidelity Machine Learning for Excitation Energies15 Oct 2024
- 2024Benchmarking Data Efficiency in Delta-ML and Multifidelity Models for Quantum Chemistry15 Oct 2024