PEA265: Perceptual Assessment of Video Compression Artifacts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The most widely used video encoders share a common hybrid coding framework that includes block-based motion estimation/compensation and block-based transform coding. Despite their high coding efficiency, the encoded videos often exhibit visually annoying artifacts, denoted as Perceivable Encoding Artifacts (PEAs), which significantly degrade the visual Qualityof- Experience (QoE) of end users. To monitor and improve visual QoE, it is crucial to develop subjective and objective measures that can identify and quantify various types of PEAs. In this work, we make the first attempt to build a large-scale subjectlabelled database composed of H.265/HEVC compressed videos containing various PEAs. The database, namely the PEA265 database, includes 4 types of spatial PEAs (i.e. blurring, blocking, ringing and color bleeding) and 2 types of temporal PEAs (i.e. flickering and floating). Each containing at least 60,000 image or video patches with positive and negative labels. To objectively identify these PEAs, we train Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) using the PEA265 database. It appears that state-of-theart ResNeXt is capable of identifying each type of PEAs with high accuracy. Furthermore, we define PEA pattern and PEA intensity measures to quantify PEA levels of compressed video sequence. We believe that the PEA265 database and our findings will benefit the future development of video quality assessment methods and perceptually motivated video encoders.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2023Bitstream-Corrupted Video Recovery: A Novel Benchmark Dataset and Methodcited by 15
- 2023Saliency-Aware Spatio-Temporal Artifact Detection for Compressed Video Quality Assessmentcited by 3
- 2022Deep Quality Assessment of Compressed Videos: A Subjective and Objective Studycited by 2
- 2023Learnt Deep Hyperparameter selection in Adversarial Training for compressed video enhancement with perceptual criticcited by 2
- 2025GeneVA: A Dataset of Human Annotations for Generative Text to Video Artifactscited by 2
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Human-Centric Videos: Dataset and Modelcited by 2
- 2024A review on Machine Learning based User-Centric Multimedia Streaming Techniquescited by 1
- 2026VOCA: Visual Odometry with Codec Awarenesscited by 1
- 2025Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Banding Artifacts on Compressed Videoscited by 0
- 2026LongVQUBench: Benchmarking Long-Term Video Quality Understanding of Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Human-Centric Videos: Dataset and Model18 Jul 2026
- 2026LongVQUBench: Benchmarking Long-Term Video Quality Understanding of Vision-Language Models1 Jul 2026
- 2026VOCA: Visual Odometry with Codec Awareness30 Jun 2026
- 2025GeneVA: A Dataset of Human Annotations for Generative Text to Video Artifacts10 Sep 2025
- 2025Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Banding Artifacts on Compressed Videos12 Aug 2025
- 2024A review on Machine Learning based User-Centric Multimedia Streaming Techniques24 Nov 2024
- 2023Bitstream-Corrupted Video Recovery: A Novel Benchmark Dataset and Method25 Sep 2023
- 2023Learnt Deep Hyperparameter selection in Adversarial Training for compressed video enhancement with perceptual critic28 Feb 2023
- 2023Saliency-Aware Spatio-Temporal Artifact Detection for Compressed Video Quality Assessment3 Jan 2023
- 2022Deep Quality Assessment of Compressed Videos: A Subjective and Objective Study7 May 2022