mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are you In or Out (of gallery)? Wisdom from the Same-Identity Crowd

arXiv 2508.06357 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A central problem in one-to-many facial identification is that the person in the probe image may or may not have enrolled image(s) in the gallery; that is, may be In-gallery or Out-of-gallery. Past approaches to detect when a rank-one result is Out-of-gallery have mostly focused on finding a suitable threshold on the similarity score. We take a new approach, using the additional enrolled images of the identity with the rank-one result to predict if the rank-one result is In-gallery / Out-of-gallery. Given a gallery of identities and images, we generate In-gallery and Out-of-gallery training data by extracting the ranks of additional enrolled images corresponding to the rank-one identity. We then train a classifier to utilize this feature vector to predict whether a rank-one result is In-gallery or Out-of-gallery. Using two different datasets and four different matchers, we present experimental results showing that our approach is viable for mugshot quality probe images, and also, importantly, for probes degraded by blur, reduced resolution, atmospheric turbulence and sunglasses. We also analyze results across demographic groups, and show that In-gallery / Out-of-gallery classification accuracy is similar across demographics. Our approach has the potential to provide an objective estimate of whether a one-to-many facial identification is Out-of-gallery, and thereby to reduce false positive identifications, wrongful arrests, and wasted investigative time. Interestingly, comparing the results of older deep CNN-based face matchers with newer ones suggests that the effectiveness of our Out-of-gallery detection approach emerges only with matchers trained using advanced margin-based loss functions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.

Builds on

17 of 42 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  3. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  4. 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
  5. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
  6. 2014Towards Open World Recognitioncited by 226
  7. 2019Probabilistic Face Embeddingscited by 171
  8. 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
  9. 2020img2pose: Face Alignment and Detection via 6DoF, Face Pose Estimationcited by 57
  10. 2021Accelerating Atmospheric Turbulence Simulation via Learned Phase-to-Space Transformcited by 50
  11. 2016Neural Aggregation Network for Video Face Recognitioncited by 44
  12. 2017Toward Open-Set Face Recognitioncited by 29
5 more
  1. 2022Cluster and Aggregate: Face Recognition with Large Probe Setcited by 22
  2. 2017Deep Heterogeneous Feature Fusion for Template-Based Face Recognitioncited by 6
  3. 2023Impact of Blur and Resolution on Demographic Disparities in 1-to-Many Facial Identificationcited by 5
  4. 2023Open-Set Face Recognition with Maximal Entropy and Objectosphere Losscited by 5
  5. 2024Impact of Sunglasses on One-to-Many Facial Identification Accuracycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.