Trusted Knowledge Extraction for Operations and Maintenance Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deriving operational intelligence from organizational data repositories is a key challenge due to the dichotomy of data confidentiality vs data integration objectives, as well as the limitations of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools relative to the specific knowledge structure of domains such as operations and maintenance. In this work, we discuss Knowledge Graph construction and break down the Knowledge Extraction process into its Named Entity Recognition, Coreference Resolution, Named Entity Linking, and Relation Extraction functional components. We then evaluate sixteen NLP tools in concert with or in comparison to the rapidly advancing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We focus on the operational and maintenance intelligence use case for trusted applications in the aircraft industry. A baseline dataset is derived from a rich public domain US Federal Aviation Administration dataset focused on equipment failures or maintenance requirements. We assess the zero-shot performance of NLP and LLM tools that can be operated within a controlled, confidential environment (no data is sent to third parties). Based on our observation of significant performance limitations, we discuss the challenges related to trusted NLP and LLM tools as well as their Technical Readiness Level for wider use in mission-critical industries such as aviation. We conclude with recommendations to enhance trust and provide our open-source curated dataset to support further baseline testing and evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2025.
Builds on
17 of 56 references.
References · 17
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2020Autoregressive Entity Retrievalcited by 334
- 2022ReFinED: An Efficient Zero-shot-capable Approach to End-to-End Entity Linkingcited by 74
- 2021Packed Levitated Marker for Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 49
- 2021Coreference Resolution without Span Representationscited by 45
- 2022DeepStruct: Pretraining of Language Models for Structure Predictioncited by 45
- 2022Autoregressive Structured Prediction with Language Modelscited by 43
- 2022Coreference Resolution through a seq2seq Transition-Based Systemcited by 34
- 2018Anaphora and Coreference Resolution: A Reviewcited by 31
- 2021Entity Linking Meets Deep Learning: Techniques and Solutionscited by 22
- 2025SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigationcited by 19
- 2024Research Trends for the Interplay between Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphscited by 15
5 more
- 2022UniRel: Unified Representation and Interaction for Joint Relational Triple Extractioncited by 14
- 2020MaintNet: A Collaborative Open-Source Library for Predictive Maintenance Language Resourcescited by 8
- 2024Do "English" Named Entity Recognizers Work Well on Global Englishes?cited by 2
- 2024Learning to Adapt to Low-Resource Paraphrase Generationcited by 2
- 2021Extracting Semantics from Maintenance Recordscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.