Invisible Injections: Exploiting Vision-Language Models Through Steganographic Prompt Embedding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models (VLMs) have revolutionized multimodal AI applications but introduce novel security vulnerabilities that remain largely unexplored. We present the first comprehensive study of steganographic prompt injection attacks against VLMs, where malicious instructions are invisibly embedded within images using advanced steganographic techniques. Our approach demonstrates that current VLM architectures can inadvertently extract and execute hidden prompts during normal image processing, leading to covert behavioral manipulation. We develop a multi-domain embedding framework combining spatial, frequency, and neural steganographic methods, achieving an overall attack success rate of 24.3% (plus or minus 3.2%, 95% CI) across leading VLMs including GPT-4V, Claude, and LLaVA, with neural steganography methods reaching up to 31.8%, while maintaining reasonable visual imperceptibility (PSNR greater than 38 dB, SSIM greater than 0.94). Through systematic evaluation on 12 diverse datasets and 8 state-of-the-art models, we reveal moderate but meaningful vulnerabilities in current VLM architectures and propose effective countermeasures. Our findings have significant implications for VLM deployment in security-critical applications and highlight the need for proportionate multimodal AI security frameworks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026SaFeR-Steer: Evolving Multi-Turn MLLMs via Synthetic Bootstrapping and Feedback Dynamicscited by 1
- 2026Covert Visual Prompt Injection against Commercial Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Hiding in Plain Floats: Steganographic Carriers for Indirect Prompt and Content Injectioncited by 0
- 2026Piggybacking on Perception: Stealthy Concurrent Audio Prompt Injections against Multimodal LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026Sorry Robot, Happy Human: Vision-Language Models Read Only One of Two Legible Typographic Layerscited by 0
- 2026Sorry Robot, Happy Human: Vision-Language Models Read Only One of Two Legible Typographic Layers25 Sep 2026
- 2026Piggybacking on Perception: Stealthy Concurrent Audio Prompt Injections against Multimodal LLM Agents30 Jul 2026
- 2026Hiding in Plain Floats: Steganographic Carriers for Indirect Prompt and Content Injection7 Jun 2026
- 2026Covert Visual Prompt Injection against Commercial Multimodal Large Language Models31 Mar 2026
- 2026SaFeR-Steer: Evolving Multi-Turn MLLMs via Synthetic Bootstrapping and Feedback Dynamics18 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DE-FIVE: Detecting Malicious Image Prompts via Fourier Features and Image Vector Embeddings
- 2026Once Poisoned, Arbitrarily Controlled: A Programmable Backdoor in VLMs
- 2026A Cross-Modal Prompt Injection Attack against Large Vision-Language Models with Image-Only Perturbation
- 2026Image-based Prompt Injection: Hijacking Multimodal LLMs through Visually Embedded Adversarial Instructions
- 2025VIP: Visual Information Protection through Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language Models
- 2026Breaking the weakest link to evade vision language models
- 2024Safeguarding Vision-Language Models Against Patched Visual Prompt Injectors
- 2025Implicit Jailbreak Attacks via Cross-Modal Information Concealment on Vision-Language Models